Supreme Court mandates Provident Fund for Contractual Employees of Pawan Hans: Pawan Hans Ltd. vs. Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana (2020)

/ Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 2(45), Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 1(3), Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 16, Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 2(f), Indu Malhotra, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court mandates Provident Fund for Contractual Employees of Pawan Hans: Pawan Hans Ltd. vs. Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contractual employees are entitled to provident fund benefits under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 or the company’s own trust regulations. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: M/S. PAWAN HANS […]

Supreme Court mandates Provident Fund for Contractual Employees of Pawan Hans: Pawan Hans Ltd. vs. Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana (2020) Read Post »