Supreme Court clarifies definition of “Excluded Employee” under Employees’ Provident Funds Act: Modern Transportation vs. EPFO (26 March 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 17, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 2(f), Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 with Paragraph 2(f), Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 with Paragraph 69(1), Exempted Employee, Judges, Membership of Fund

Supreme Court Clarifies “Excluded Employee” Definition Under EPF Act: Modern Transportation vs. EPFO (2019) Date of the Judgment: 26 March 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 293 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can retired employees who have withdrawn their full provident fund benefits from their previous employer be considered “excluded employees” when re-employed […]

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “Excluded Employee” under Employees’ Provident Funds Act: Modern Transportation vs. EPFO (26 March 2019) Read Post »