Employment Law

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of “Deputation” in employment contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause II(5), D.Y. Chandrachud, Deputation, Employment Contract, Employment Law, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Deputation Requirements in Employment Contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s overseas travel for a business meeting constitutes a “deputation” requiring them to serve a mandatory period upon return, as per their employment contract. CASE TYPE: Contract Law/Employment Law Case Name: Ms Sarita Singh vs. M/s Shree […]

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of “Deputation” in employment contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition for employment: Eastern Coalfields vs. Anadinath Banerjee (2021)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Employment Law, Employment Law with Section 617 of the erstwhile Companies Act 1956, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 3(m), M.R. Shah, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, Rehabilitation Schemes

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition for employment: Eastern Coalfields vs. Anadinath Banerjee (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person is entitled to employment based on land acquired, when the land holding is computed by including land of relatives. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Limited vs. Anadinath Banerjee [Judgment Date]: 23 July

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition for employment: Eastern Coalfields vs. Anadinath Banerjee (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Eligibility Criteria for Peon Posts: Punjab National Bank vs. Anit Kumar Das (2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Eligibility Criteria, Employment Law, Judges, M. R. Shah, R. Subhash Reddy, Recruitment, Suppression of Facts

Supreme Court Settles Eligibility Criteria for Peon Posts: Punjab National Bank vs. Anit Kumar Das (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate can be denied employment for possessing a higher qualification than prescribed for the post, and whether suppressing the fact of having a higher qualification is a valid ground for cancellation of candidature. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Settles Eligibility Criteria for Peon Posts: Punjab National Bank vs. Anit Kumar Das (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Based on Experience Certificates: Food Corporation of India vs. Rimjhim (2019)

/ Employment Law, Essential Qualifications, Experience Certificate, Job Application, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah, Recruitment, Service Law, Service Law with Advertisement

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Based on Experience Certificates: Food Corporation of India vs. Rimjhim (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer can reject a candidate for not submitting an experience certificate with the application when the advertisement does not explicitly require it, and when the candidate possesses the required experience. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Based on Experience Certificates: Food Corporation of India vs. Rimjhim (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Long-Serving Teacher Despite Qualification Issue: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

/ Employment Law, Equity in Employment, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Service Law, Teacher Employment

Supreme Court Protects Long-Serving Teacher Despite Qualification Issue: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a teacher with long service can be removed for lacking requisite qualifications. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 17, 2018 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Protects Long-Serving Teacher Despite Qualification Issue: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top