Equity

Supreme Court Upholds 9% Interest on Share Sale in Company Dispute: Vinod Krishan Khanna & Ors. vs. Amritsar Swadeshi Woollen Mills Private Limited (23 February 2021)

/ Appellate Review, B.R. Gavai, Civil Procedure, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 397, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 398, Equity, Judges, Oppression and Mismanagement, Principles of Equity, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Suo Moto Powers, Unjust Enrichment

Supreme Court Upholds 9% Interest on Share Sale in Company Dispute: Vinod Krishan Khanna & Ors. vs. Amritsar Swadeshi Woollen Mills Private Limited (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) was correct in reducing the interest rate awarded by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on the sale of shares in […]

Supreme Court Upholds 9% Interest on Share Sale in Company Dispute: Vinod Krishan Khanna & Ors. vs. Amritsar Swadeshi Woollen Mills Private Limited (23 February 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Excess Spectrum Charges: Union of India vs. Reliance Communication Limited (2020)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Execution of Contract, Judges, R.F. Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, Spectrum Auction, Telecom Law, Telecom Law with Clause 4.5b(ix) of NIA 2013, Telecom Law with Clause 4.5b(x) of NIA 2015, Unjust Enrichment

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Excess Spectrum Charges: Union of India vs. Reliance Communication Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Union of India can withhold excess amounts realized from the encashment of bank guarantees after the licensee has furnished fresh guarantees for the same liability. CASE TYPE: Telecom/Contract Law Case Name: Union of India vs.

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Excess Spectrum Charges: Union of India vs. Reliance Communication Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Regularization of MBBS Admission Under NRI Quota: Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) (28 July 2008)

/ Admission, B.N. Agrawal, Complete Justice, Constitutional Law, Education Law, Equity, G.S. Singhvi, Judges, NRI Quota

Can a student, provisionally admitted to an MBBS course under the NRI quota, have their admission regularized if a seat becomes available? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) Admission Committee and Ors., where an MBBS student sought regularization of his

Supreme Court Directs Regularization of MBBS Admission Under NRI Quota: Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah vs. Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.) (28 July 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top