Evidence Act with Section 114

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bank fraud case, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence: Hiralal Babulal Soni vs. State of Maharashtra (25 February 2025)

/ B.R. Gavai, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 106, Evidence Act with Section 114, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, K.V. Viswanathan, Offences Against Property, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 266 Judges: B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, K.V. Viswanathan The Supreme Court of India recently addressed a case involving a large-scale fraud committed through fake Telegraphic Transfers (TTs) at a Vijaya Bank branch in Maharashtra. The central question was whether the accused, Nandkumar Babulal Soni, […]

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bank fraud case, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence: Hiralal Babulal Soni vs. State of Maharashtra (25 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 411 IPC due to lack of evidence of knowledge of stolen property: Shiv Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 114, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 24, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Offences Relating to Property

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 411 IPC due to lack of evidence of knowledge of stolen property: Shiv Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the essential ingredients of Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 are met when the prosecution fails to prove that the accused had knowledge that

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 411 IPC due to lack of evidence of knowledge of stolen property: Shiv Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Land Possession Dispute: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma (2017)

/ Arun Mishra, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 101, Evidence Act with Section 114, Judges, Land Disputes, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Possession of Land, Property Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of rightful possession of land in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma and Others Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 756 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can mere entries in

Supreme Court Settles Land Possession Dispute: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top