Excise Law

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “manufacture” under Central Excise Act: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jindal Drugs Ltd. (2024)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 2(f), Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Chapter 18, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Note 3 to Chapter 18, Cenvat Credit, Excise Law, Manufacture, Rebate

Supreme Court Clarifies “Manufacture” Definition in Excise Law: Jindal Drugs Case (2024) Date of the Judgment: April 30, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 354 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can the simple act of affixing labels on product packaging be considered “manufacturing” under excise law? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “manufacture” under Central Excise Act: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jindal Drugs Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Liquor License Allotment, Dismisses Challenge Based on Locus Standi: Suresh Chandra vs. Joga Singh Bisht (26 October 2020)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Contract Law, Excise Law, Excise Law with Section 34, Excise Law with Section 36, Government Contracts, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Licensing, Locus Standi

Supreme Court Upholds Liquor License Allotment, Dismisses Challenge Based on Locus Standi: Suresh Chandra vs. Joga Singh Bisht (2020) Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 777 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. Can a High Court interfere with a government contract based on a claim of potential

Supreme Court Upholds Liquor License Allotment, Dismisses Challenge Based on Locus Standi: Suresh Chandra vs. Joga Singh Bisht (26 October 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top