Rebate

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “manufacture” under Central Excise Act: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jindal Drugs Ltd. (2024)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 2(f), Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Chapter 18, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Note 3 to Chapter 18, Cenvat Credit, Excise Law, Manufacture, Rebate

Supreme Court Clarifies “Manufacture” Definition in Excise Law: Jindal Drugs Case (2024) Date of the Judgment: April 30, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 354 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can the simple act of affixing labels on product packaging be considered “manufacturing” under excise law? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “manufacture” under Central Excise Act: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jindal Drugs Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 33, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Escalation Charges, Fixed Price Clause, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Rebate, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: March 04, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 127 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Surya Kant, J., and Aniruddha Bose, J. Can an arbitrator’s decision on contract interpretation be challenged in court if

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top