Family Law

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of Matrimonial Suit CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal [Judgment Date]: February 25, 2022 Date of the Judgment: February 25, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a divorce petition be […]

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Transfer Order in Property Dispute: Himalaya Distilleries vs. Urmila Pradhan (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Civil Procedure, Court Jurisdiction, Judges, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Modifies Transfer Order in Property Dispute: Himalaya Distilleries vs. Urmila Pradhan (2022) Date of the Judgment: February 25, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a procedural error in a court order be rectified to ensure the case proceeds in the correct jurisdiction? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court Modifies Transfer Order in Property Dispute: Himalaya Distilleries vs. Urmila Pradhan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Judges, Jurisdiction of Courts, M.R. Shah, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can transfer cases from Special Courts to jurisdictional courts in a disposed of matter on a special mentioning. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes FIR against in-laws in dowry harassment case: Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar (2022)

/ Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Krishna Murari, Matrimonial Disputes, Offences Against Marriage, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court quashes FIR against in-laws in dowry harassment case: Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether general and omnibus allegations against in-laws in a dowry harassment case warrant quashing of the FIR. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Matrimonial Disputes. Case Name: Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam & Ors. vs. State of Bihar &

Supreme Court quashes FIR against in-laws in dowry harassment case: Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Conjugal Rights Case: Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Family Law, Judges, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Sanjiv Khanna, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Conjugal Rights Case: Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. CASE TYPE: Family Law. Case Name: Smt Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar. [Judgment Date]: January 27, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 27, 2022. Citation: TP(C) 1532/2020. Judges:

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Conjugal Rights Case: Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Conjugal Rights Case: Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar (27 January 2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Family Law, Judges, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Sanjiv Khanna, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Conjugal Rights Case: Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of a petition for restitution of conjugal rights from one court to another. CASE TYPE: Family Law. Case Name: Smt Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar. Judgment Date: 27 January 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 January 2022

Supreme Court Transfers Conjugal Rights Case: Akkireddy Nihaarika vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Wife’s Location: Sharmila Bagchi vs. Sourav Gangopadhayay (2022)

/ Family Law, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Surya Kant, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Wife’s Location: Sharmila Bagchi vs. Sourav Gangopadhayay (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of a matrimonial dispute case. CASE TYPE: Family Law. Case Name: Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay vs. Sourav Gangopadhayay. [Judgment Date]: January 18, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 18, 2022. Citation: Not Available. Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Wife’s Location: Sharmila Bagchi vs. Sourav Gangopadhayay (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Maintenance: Uma Priyadarshini vs. Suchith K Nair (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 151, Family Law, Indira Banerjee, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Maintenance, Matrimonial Disputes

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Maintenance: Uma Priyadarshini vs. Suchith K Nair (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of maintenance for a wife and child in matrimonial disputes. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute/Family Law Case Name: Uma Priyadarshini S. vs. Suchith K Nair Judgment Date: January 6, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 6, 2022

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Maintenance: Uma Priyadarshini vs. Suchith K Nair (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Maintenance Rights of Wife and Child: Uma Priyadarshini vs. Suchith K Nair (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Family Law, Indira Banerjee, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Maintenance, Matrimonial Dispute

Supreme Court Upholds Maintenance Rights of Wife and Child: Uma Priyadarshini vs. Suchith K Nair (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife is entitled to maintenance even if she is gainfully employed, and the appropriate amount of maintenance for a child. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Matrimonial Dispute, Maintenance Case Name: Uma Priyadarshini S. vs. Suchith K

Supreme Court Upholds Maintenance Rights of Wife and Child: Uma Priyadarshini vs. Suchith K Nair (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction Under Section 498A IPC in Matrimonial Dispute After Settlement (3 January 2022)

/ Criminal Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Matrimonial Dispute After Settlement LEGAL ISSUE: Can a conviction under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 be quashed if the parties have settled their matrimonial dispute and are living together harmoniously? CASE TYPE: Criminal Law (Matrimonial Dispute) Case Name: Rajendra Bhagat vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. [Judgment

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction Under Section 498A IPC in Matrimonial Dispute After Settlement (3 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Sudhir Kumar Singh vs. Jaishri (2021)

/ Contempt of Court, Contempt Petition, Divorce Law, Family Law, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Sudhir Kumar Singh vs. Jaishri (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 09, 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Sanjiv Khanna Can a contempt petition be withdrawn if the terms of an agreement are not met in a matrimonial dispute? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Dispute: Sudhir Kumar Singh vs. Jaishri (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses Wife’s Plea to Return to Matrimonial Home Amidst Divorce Proceedings: Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff vs. Poonam Jaidev Shroff (2021)

/ B.R. Gavai, Divorce Proceedings, Family Law, Interim Maintenance, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Matrimonial Disputes, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 2(s), Shared Household

Supreme Court Refuses Wife’s Plea to Return to Matrimonial Home Amidst Divorce Proceedings: Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff vs. Poonam Jaidev Shroff (2021) Date of the Judgment: 03 December 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a wife, amidst a contentious divorce and multiple legal battles, compel her husband to

Supreme Court Refuses Wife’s Plea to Return to Matrimonial Home Amidst Divorce Proceedings: Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff vs. Poonam Jaidev Shroff (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top