Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992

Supreme Court quashes penalty for non-fulfillment of export obligation under FT Act: M/S. Embio Limited vs. Director General of Foreign Trade & Ors. (2024) INSC 408 (13 May 2024)

/ Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Foreign Trade Law, Foreign Trade Law with Section 11

Supreme Court quashes penalty for non-fulfillment of export obligation under FT Act: M/S. Embio Limited vs. Director General of Foreign Trade & Ors. (2024) INSC 408 (13 May 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a penalty can be imposed under Section 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 for non-fulfillment of export obligations under […]

Supreme Court quashes penalty for non-fulfillment of export obligation under FT Act: M/S. Embio Limited vs. Director General of Foreign Trade & Ors. (2024) INSC 408 (13 May 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest on Delayed Duty Drawback for Deemed Exports: Union of India vs. B.T. Patil (2024)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11A, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11B, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11BB, Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 27, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 27A, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 75A, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 with Rule 2(e)

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest on Delayed Duty Drawback for Deemed Exports: Union of India vs. B.T. Patil (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether interest is applicable on delayed duty drawback refunds for deemed exports under the Exim Policy. CASE TYPE: Civil, Foreign Trade Case Name: Union of India and Ors. vs. M/S. B. T. Patil and Sons

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest on Delayed Duty Drawback for Deemed Exports: Union of India vs. B.T. Patil (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Absolute Confiscation of Illegally Imported Pulses: Union of India vs. Raj Grow Impex LLP (2021)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 11, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 125, Dinesh Maheshwari, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 with Section 3, Judges, Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Upholds Absolute Confiscation of Illegally Imported Pulses: Union of India vs. Raj Grow Impex LLP (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether illegally imported pulses, in violation of trade restrictions, are subject to absolute confiscation or can be released with a redemption fine. CASE TYPE: Customs Law, Import/Export Regulation Case Name: Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Absolute Confiscation of Illegally Imported Pulses: Union of India vs. Raj Grow Impex LLP (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Import Restrictions on Pulses: Union of India vs. Agricas LLP (26 August 2020)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 77, Dinesh Maheshwari, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 with Section 3, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 with Section 9A, Foreign Trade Policy, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Import Restrictions on Pulses: Union of India vs. Agricas LLP (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Central Government can impose import restrictions on pulses under Section 3 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act), or if such restrictions must exclusively adhere to the procedure under Section 9A of the

Supreme Court Upholds Import Restrictions on Pulses: Union of India vs. Agricas LLP (26 August 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Export Incentive Scheme: Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills vs. Union of India (2020)

/ Deepak Gupta, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 with Section 5, Foreign Trade Policy, Hemant Gupta, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Export Incentive Scheme: Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills vs. Union of India (2020) Date of the Judgment: February 14, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 149 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a company purchasing goods from a 100% export-oriented unit claim export incentives? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Clarifies Export Incentive Scheme: Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows import of restricted goods on payment of market value: Commissioner of Customs vs. M/S. Atul Automations Pvt. Ltd. (24 January 2019)

/ Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 125, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 with Section 11, Foreign Trade Policy, Import/Export Regulation, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navin Sinha, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court allows import of restricted goods on payment of market value: Commissioner of Customs vs. M/S. Atul Automations Pvt. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether restricted goods imported without authorization can be released on payment of market value. CASE TYPE: Customs Law, Import/Export Regulation Case Name: Commissioner of Customs vs. M/S. Atul Automations Pvt. Ltd.

Supreme Court allows import of restricted goods on payment of market value: Commissioner of Customs vs. M/S. Atul Automations Pvt. Ltd. (24 January 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top