Fundamental Rules

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India (2023)

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the order of compulsory retirement of a government employee was justified under Fundamental Rule 56(j). CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India and Another Judgment Date: 03 March 2023 Date […]

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Stepping Up of Pay for Seniors: Union of India vs. C.R. Madhava Murthy (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Stepping Up of Pay for Seniors: Union of India vs. C.R. Madhava Murthy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether senior employees are entitled to a stepping up of pay to match their juniors’ pay when the juniors receive higher pay due to an Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme upgradation, despite the seniors having already

Supreme Court Upholds Stepping Up of Pay for Seniors: Union of India vs. C.R. Madhava Murthy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Premature Retirement: CISF Employee’s Service Record Scrutinized (2022)

Premature Retirement of CISF Head Constable Upheld: Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government employee’s entire service record, including past adverse remarks, can be considered for premature retirement, even if the employee has been promoted since those remarks. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Central Industrial Security Force vs. HC

Supreme Court Upholds Premature Retirement: CISF Employee’s Service Record Scrutinized (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (27 February 2020)

Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers Upheld by Supreme Court: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the compulsory retirement of judicial officers was justified based on their service records and allegations of misconduct. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand [Judgment Date]: 27 February 2020

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (27 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Retiral Benefits Claim: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudarshana Chatterjee (2019) – Employee Conduct

Supreme Court Rejects Retiral Benefits Claim: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudarshana Chatterjee (2019) – Employee Conduct LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who joins another service without proper approval and without getting her leave sanctioned is entitled to retiral benefits from her previous employer. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Uttar Pradesh &

Supreme Court Rejects Retiral Benefits Claim: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudarshana Chatterjee (2019) – Employee Conduct Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS (2019)

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists LEGAL ISSUE: Whether special pay granted to scientists should be included in the calculation of pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Dr. O.P. Nijhawan & Ors. Judgment Date: 03 January 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 03

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top