Fundamental Rules with Rule 56(j)

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India (2023)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Compulsory Retirement, Fundamental Rules, Fundamental Rules with Rule 56(j), Hima Kohli, Judges, Service Law, Service Law with Fundamental Rule 56(j)

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the order of compulsory retirement of a government employee was justified under Fundamental Rule 56(j). CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India and Another Judgment Date: 03 March 2023 Date […]

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order: Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Premature Retirement: CISF Employee’s Service Record Scrutinized (2022)

/ Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 48(1)(b), Fundamental Rules, Fundamental Rules with Rule 56(j), Hemant Gupta, Judges, Premature Retirement, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 48(1)(b) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, Service Law with Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, V. Ramasubramanian

Premature Retirement of CISF Head Constable Upheld: Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government employee’s entire service record, including past adverse remarks, can be considered for premature retirement, even if the employee has been promoted since those remarks. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Central Industrial Security Force vs. HC

Supreme Court Upholds Premature Retirement: CISF Employee’s Service Record Scrutinized (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (27 February 2020)

/ Compulsory Retirement, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 235, Deepak Gupta, Fundamental Rules, Fundamental Rules with Rule 56(j), Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, Jharkhand Service Code, 2001 with Rule 274(b)(ii), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 56(j)

Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers Upheld by Supreme Court: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the compulsory retirement of judicial officers was justified based on their service records and allegations of misconduct. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand [Judgment Date]: 27 February 2020

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers: Arun Kumar Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (27 February 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top