Government Contracts

Supreme Court Orders Refund for Undelivered Sand Block: Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra (2020)

/ Administrative Law, Arbitrary Action, B.R. Gavai, Breach of contract, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Law, Government Contracts, Judges, Model Litigant, Refund of Contract Amount, S.A. Bobde, Surya Kant, Writ Petition

Supreme Court Orders Refund for Undelivered Sand Block: Popatrao vs. State of Maharashtra (2020) Date of the Judgment: February 14, 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 138 Judges: S.A. Bobde, CJI., B.R. Gavai, J., Surya Kant, J. Can a citizen be denied a refund for a government contract when the government fails to deliver the contracted goods? […]

Supreme Court Orders Refund for Undelivered Sand Block: Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs State to consider sewer scheme for Yeola Municipal Council: Madhoor Buildwell vs. Yeola Municipal Council (2019)

/ Central Government Funding, Contract Law, Government Contracts, Government Schemes, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Privity of Contract, State Government Funding, Tender Process

Supreme Court directs State to consider sewer scheme for Yeola Municipal Council: Madhoor Buildwell vs. Yeola Municipal Council (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractor can claim funds from the Central Government based on inter-departmental communications for a project under a discontinued scheme. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Government Contracts, Urban Development Case Name: M/s. Madhoor Buildwell

Supreme Court directs State to consider sewer scheme for Yeola Municipal Council: Madhoor Buildwell vs. Yeola Municipal Council (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection Based on Sister Company’s Adverse Record in Government Contracts (21 June 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 12, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 1.19 of the Manual of Contracts, 2007, Deepak Gupta, Government Contracts, Judges, Judicial Review, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection Based on Sister Company’s Adverse Record Date of the Judgment: 21 June 2019 Citation: The Silppi Constructions Contractors vs. Union of India and Anr. ETC. ETC., Special Leave Petition(Civil) Nos. 13802-13805 of 2019 Judges: Deepak Gupta J., Surya Kant J. Can a government authority reject a company’s tender based on

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection Based on Sister Company’s Adverse Record in Government Contracts (21 June 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes (30 April 2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 80, Contract Law, Government Contracts, Government Litigation, Judges, Notice Requirements, R. F. Nariman, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Notice Requirements under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes Date of the Judgment: 30 April 2019 Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4495-4496 OF 2019 Judges: R. F. Nariman, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can a government contractor proceed with a civil suit against the State without strictly adhering

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Government Contract Disputes (30 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Wage Escalation: Union of India vs. Varindera Constructions Ltd. (2018)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 5, Ashok Bhushan, Contract Law, Government Contracts, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Wage Escalation: Union of India vs. Varindera Constructions Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractor can claim additional costs for increased labor wages due to statutory hikes, despite a contractual clause prohibiting such claims. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Union of India vs. M/s. Varindera Constructions Ltd. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Bar on Wage Escalation: Union of India vs. Varindera Constructions Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Forged Lease, Reinforces Article 14: Usha Mehta vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (2012)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 299, Contract Law, Fundamental Rights, G.S. Singhvi, Government Contracts, Judges, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

Date of the Judgment: October 16, 2012 Citation: (2012) INSC 642 Judges: Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya Can a forged lease document grant any legal rights? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case involving a disputed land lease. The court upheld the decision of the Andhra Pradesh

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Forged Lease, Reinforces Article 14: Usha Mehta vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (2012) Read Post »

Scroll to Top