Government Schemes

Supreme Court quashes LARSGESS Scheme benefits: Union of India vs. Bhagwan Deen (2022)

/ Government Schemes, Judges, LARSGESS Scheme, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Termination of Schemes, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court quashes LARSGESS Scheme benefits: Union of India vs. Bhagwan Deen (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether benefits can be claimed under the LARSGESS Scheme after its termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Bhagwan Deen & Anr. Judgment Date: April 05, 2022 Date of the Judgment: April 05, 2022 […]

Supreme Court quashes LARSGESS Scheme benefits: Union of India vs. Bhagwan Deen (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles applicability of ACP vs MACP Scheme for Central Government Employees: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. (24 March 2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, B.R. Gavai, Central Government Employees, Financial Upgradation, Government Schemes, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, Service Law, Service Law with Office Memorandum dated 9th August, 1999

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of ACP and MACP schemes for government employees LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme or Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 March 2022 Introduction Date

Supreme Court settles applicability of ACP vs MACP Scheme for Central Government Employees: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. (24 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Freedom Fighter Pension Claim Due to Lack of Evidence: Union of India vs. Krishna Modi (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Eligibility Criteria, Government Schemes, Judges, Pension Law, Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Rejects Freedom Fighter Pension Claim Due to Lack of Evidence: Union of India vs. Krishna Modi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Eligibility for pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980, specifically concerning the requirement of being an underground freedom fighter. CASE TYPE: Pension Law Case Name: Union of India vs. Krishna Modi &

Supreme Court Rejects Freedom Fighter Pension Claim Due to Lack of Evidence: Union of India vs. Krishna Modi (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles MACP implementation date for Central Government Employees: Union of India vs. R.K. Sharma (28 April 2021)

/ Allowances for Central Govt. Employees, Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS), Central Government Employees, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, MACP Implementation Date, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), Service Law, Service Law with MACP Implementation Date, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies MACP Implementation Date for Central Government Employees: Union of India vs. R.K. Sharma (2021) Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 216 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for central government employees be implemented from 01.01.2006, or should

Supreme Court settles MACP implementation date for Central Government Employees: Union of India vs. R.K. Sharma (28 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Teachers Appointed Under Himachal Pradesh Schemes (2020)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Government Schemes, Himachal Pradesh Service Rules, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R. Subhash Reddy, Regularization of Employees, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Teachers Appointed Under Himachal Pradesh Schemes (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether teachers appointed under various schemes by the Himachal Pradesh government can be regularized despite initial conditions against regularization and alleged violations of recruitment rules. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Chander Mohan Negi & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Teachers Appointed Under Himachal Pradesh Schemes (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs State to consider sewer scheme for Yeola Municipal Council: Madhoor Buildwell vs. Yeola Municipal Council (2019)

/ Central Government Funding, Contract Law, Government Contracts, Government Schemes, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Privity of Contract, State Government Funding, Tender Process

Supreme Court directs State to consider sewer scheme for Yeola Municipal Council: Madhoor Buildwell vs. Yeola Municipal Council (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractor can claim funds from the Central Government based on inter-departmental communications for a project under a discontinued scheme. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Government Contracts, Urban Development Case Name: M/s. Madhoor Buildwell

Supreme Court directs State to consider sewer scheme for Yeola Municipal Council: Madhoor Buildwell vs. Yeola Municipal Council (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top