Supreme Court prioritizes child’s welfare over comity of courts in custody battle: Nithya Anand Raghavan vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2017)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 14, Guardianship, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of comity of courts should override the paramount welfare of the child in international child custody disputes. CASE TYPE: Child Custody, Habeas Corpus Case Name: Nithya Anand Raghavan vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. [Judgment Date]: July 3, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 3, 2017 Citation: […]

Supreme Court prioritizes child’s welfare over comity of courts in custody battle: Nithya Anand Raghavan vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2017) Read Post »