Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 with Section 118

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Violation of Himachal Pradesh Land Laws: Ajay Dabra vs. Pyare Ram & Ors. (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Violation of Himachal Pradesh Land Laws LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in filing an appeal can be condoned, and whether a suit for specific performance can be granted when the initial agreement violates land transfer laws. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Ajay Dabra […]

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Violation of Himachal Pradesh Land Laws: Ajay Dabra vs. Pyare Ram & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Invalid Land Transfer: Ajay Dabra vs. Pyare Ram & Ors. (2023)

January 31, 2023 / Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 149, Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972, Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 with Section 118, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Invalid Land Transfer: Ajay Dabra vs. Pyare Ram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in filing an appeal can be condoned based on insufficient funds and whether a suit for specific performance can be decreed when the initial contract for sale

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Due to Delay and Invalid Land Transfer: Ajay Dabra vs. Pyare Ram & Ors. (2023) Read Post »