Karta

Supreme Court Upholds Karta’s Authority in Joint Hindu Family Property Sale: Beereddy Dasaratharami Reddy vs. V. Manjunath (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 1, Hindu Law, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Succession Act with Section 8, Joint Hindu Family, Judges, Karta, Legal Necessity, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Karta’s Authority in Joint Hindu Family Property Sale: Beereddy Dasaratharami Reddy vs. V. Manjunath (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Authority of a Karta to sell joint Hindu family property, and the requirement of legal necessity. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Case Name: Beereddy Dasaratharami Reddy vs. V. Manjunath and Another [Judgment Date]: 13 […]

Supreme Court Upholds Karta’s Authority in Joint Hindu Family Property Sale: Beereddy Dasaratharami Reddy vs. V. Manjunath (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Vijay A. Mittal vs. Kulwant Rai (28 January 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 22 Rule 4(2), Hindu Law, Hindu Undivided Family, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 65, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Karta, Specific Performance

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Vijay A. Mittal vs. Kulwant Rai (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sale agreement entered into by the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is binding on the family and whether a subsequent sale to a third party can be nullified in a suit for specific performance. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Vijay A. Mittal vs. Kulwant Rai (28 January 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top