Supreme Court Overrules Restrictions on Videoconferencing in Matrimonial Disputes: Santhini vs. Vijaya Venketesh (2017) INSC 847 (9 October 2017)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Family Courts Act, 1984, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 11, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 9, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 22, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 23(2), Judges

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether videoconferencing can be used in matrimonial disputes under the Family Courts Act, 1984. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law. Case Name: Santhini vs. Vijaya Venketesh. Judgment Date: 9 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 9 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 847 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J. (Majority Opinion), Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, […]

Supreme Court Overrules Restrictions on Videoconferencing in Matrimonial Disputes: Santhini vs. Vijaya Venketesh (2017) INSC 847 (9 October 2017) Read Post »