Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Property Dispute: Elumalai vs. Kamala (2023)

/ Estoppel, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Transfer of Property Act, Transfer of Property Act with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Property Dispute: Elumalai vs. Kamala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a release deed executed by a father relinquishing his rights in his father’s self-acquired property, for consideration, estops his sons from claiming a share in the same property after the grandfather’s death. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Elumalai @ […]

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Property Dispute: Elumalai vs. Kamala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel on Inheritance Rights Based on Father’s Release Deed: Elumalai vs. Kamala (2023)

/ Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hrishikesh Roy, Inheritance Law, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Transfer of Property Act, Transfer of Property Act with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel on Inheritance Rights Based on Father’s Release Deed: Elumalai vs. Kamala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a release deed executed by a father relinquishing his inheritance rights, for consideration, estops his children from claiming those rights upon the grandfather’s death. CASE TYPE: Civil – Property Law, Inheritance Case Name: Elumalai @ Venkatesan

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel on Inheritance Rights Based on Father’s Release Deed: Elumalai vs. Kamala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Company Law Board Order in Family Dispute over Biological E. Ltd. (06 April 2022)

/ Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 397, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 398, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 399, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 152(6), Companies Act, 2013 with Section 196, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Company Law Board Order in Family Dispute over Biological E. Ltd. Date of the Judgment: 06 April 2022 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari. This was a unanimous decision. Can a family

Supreme Court Upholds Company Law Board Order in Family Dispute over Biological E. Ltd. (06 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order II Rule 3, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Non-Joinder of Parties, Partition of Property, Self-Acquired Property

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether self-acquired properties of a deceased person can be partitioned among legal heirs and whether a suit for partition can be dismissed for non-joinder of other family members and properties. CASE TYPE: Civil (Partition) Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles inheritance rights of sons born before adoption: Kalindi vs. Manohar (2020)

/ Class I Heirs, Hemant Gupta, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Inheritance Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Sons Born Before Adoption: Kalindi vs. Manohar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether sons born to a Hindu man before his adoption are entitled to inherit his property in his adoptive family. CASE TYPE: Civil – Inheritance Law Case Name: Kalindi Damodar Garde (D) By Lrs. vs Manohar Laxman Kulkarni (D)

Supreme Court settles inheritance rights of sons born before adoption: Kalindi vs. Manohar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies daughters’ rights in ancestral property after Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 1989: Mangammal vs T.B. Raju (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Ancestral Property, Civil Law, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 29-A, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Judges, Partition Suit, Property Law, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court clarifies daughters’ rights in ancestral property after Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 1989: Mangammal vs T.B. Raju (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the rights of daughters in ancestral property after the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Rights, Hindu Succession Case Name: Mangammal @ Thulasi and Anr. vs.

Supreme Court clarifies daughters’ rights in ancestral property after Tamil Nadu Amendment Act, 1989: Mangammal vs T.B. Raju (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top