Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 143(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment of Amalgamated Companies: PCIT vs. Mahagun Realtors (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment of Amalgamated Companies: PCIT vs. Mahagun Realtors (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an assessment order in the name of an amalgamating company is valid after the company has ceased to exist due to amalgamation. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – 2 vs. M/s. Mahagun […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Assessment of Amalgamated Companies: PCIT vs. Mahagun Realtors (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the requirements for valid notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s I-Ven Interactive Limited (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Notice Requirements under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a notice issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is valid if sent to the address available in the PAN database, even if the assessee has changed their address and not updated it with the Income

Supreme Court clarifies the requirements for valid notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s I-Ven Interactive Limited (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles assessment order validity when issued to a non-existent company in tax cases: PCIT vs. Maruti Suzuki (25 July 2019)

Supreme Court on Assessment Order in the Name of Non-Existent Company: PCIT vs. Maruti Suzuki (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an assessment order issued in the name of an amalgamated company, which ceased to exist, is valid under the Income Tax Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, New

Supreme Court settles assessment order validity when issued to a non-existent company in tax cases: PCIT vs. Maruti Suzuki (25 July 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top