Income Tax Act, 1961

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Non-Compete Fees: Shiv Raj Gupta vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax (2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Non-Compete Fees: Shiv Raj Gupta vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a non-compete fee received by a former managing director is taxable as business income or a capital receipt. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: Shiv Raj Gupta vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Delhi-IV Judgment Date: 22nd July, 2020 […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Non-Compete Fees: Shiv Raj Gupta vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act for services to foreign enterprises: Ramnath & Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Under Section 80-O of Income Tax Act for Services to Foreign Enterprises Date of the Judgment: June 5, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 415 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can income earned by Indian companies for services provided to foreign enterprises qualify for tax deductions under Section 80-O of the

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act for services to foreign enterprises: Ramnath & Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the interplay of Section 143(1) and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in refund processing: Vodafone Idea Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (29 April 2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Income Tax Refund Processing When Scrutiny Notice Issued LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Income Tax Department is obligated to process a tax refund under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when a scrutiny notice has been issued under Section 143(2) of the same Act. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: Vodafone

Supreme Court clarifies the interplay of Section 143(1) and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in refund processing: Vodafone Idea Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (29 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Payments to Non-Resident Sports Associations: PILCOM vs. C.I.T. West Bengal-VII (29 April 2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Payments to Non-Resident Sports Associations: PILCOM vs. C.I.T. West Bengal-VII (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether payments made to non-resident sports associations for matches played in India are subject to tax deduction at source. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: PILCOM vs. C.I.T. West Bengal-VII [Judgment Date]: 29 April 2020

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Payments to Non-Resident Sports Associations: PILCOM vs. C.I.T. West Bengal-VII (29 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act in Leave Encashment Deductions: Union of India vs. Exide Industries Limited (2020) INSC 305 (24 April 2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act in Leave Encashment Deductions Date of the Judgment: 24 April 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 305 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Hemant Gupta, J., and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical question regarding the validity of Section 43B(f) of the Income

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act in Leave Encashment Deductions: Union of India vs. Exide Industries Limited (2020) INSC 305 (24 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Mutuality Claim for Advertising Subsidiary: Yum! Restaurants vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (24 April 2020)

Supreme Court Denies Mutuality Claim for Advertising Subsidiary: Yum! Restaurants vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) Date of the Judgment: 24 April 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 288 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a company, created as a subsidiary for advertising and marketing, claim tax exemption under the doctrine of mutuality? The

Supreme Court Denies Mutuality Claim for Advertising Subsidiary: Yum! Restaurants vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (24 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies addition of cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Basir Ahmed Sisodiya vs. Income Tax Officer (24 April 2020)

Supreme Court on Cash Credits under Section 68 of Income Tax Act: Basir Ahmed Sisodiya vs. ITO (2020) Date of the Judgment: 24 April 2020 Citation: Basir Ahmed Sisodiya v. The Income Tax Officer, Civil Appeal No. 6110 of 2009 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can an assessing officer add ‘cash credits’

Supreme Court clarifies addition of cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: Basir Ahmed Sisodiya vs. Income Tax Officer (24 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Preparatory or Auxiliary” Activities under DTAA: Union of India vs. U.A.E. Exchange Centre (24 April 2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Preparatory or Auxiliary” Activities under DTAA: Union of India vs. U.A.E. Exchange Centre (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “preparatory or auxiliary” activities under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Union of India & Anr. vs. U.A.E. Exchange Centre Judgment Date: 24 April 2020 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Clarifies “Preparatory or Auxiliary” Activities under DTAA: Union of India vs. U.A.E. Exchange Centre (24 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 143(1-A) of the Income Tax Act in cases of bonafide errors: Rajasthan State Electricity Board vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (2020)

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 143(1-A) of the Income Tax Act in cases of bonafide errors: Rajasthan State Electricity Board vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) Date of the Judgment: March 19, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 253 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. (authored by Ashok Bhushan, J.) Can a

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 143(1-A) of the Income Tax Act in cases of bonafide errors: Rajasthan State Electricity Board vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Prioritizes Secured Creditor Rights Over Tax Dues in Property Dispute: Connectwell Industries vs. Union of India (2020)

Supreme Court Prioritizes Secured Creditor Rights Over Tax Dues in Property Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior secured debt takes precedence over government tax dues when a property is sold by a Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). CASE TYPE: Debt Recovery/Tax Law Case Name: M/s. Connectwell Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Judgment Date: March

Supreme Court Prioritizes Secured Creditor Rights Over Tax Dues in Property Dispute: Connectwell Industries vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Section 80-IA deduction eligibility for a company succeeding a partnership in infrastructure projects: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Chetak Enterprises (2020) INSC 179 (05 March 2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 80-IA Deduction for Company Succeeding Partnership in Infrastructure Project Date of the Judgment: 05 March 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 179 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a company claim tax deductions under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for an infrastructure project when it has taken over

Supreme Court settles Section 80-IA deduction eligibility for a company succeeding a partnership in infrastructure projects: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Chetak Enterprises (2020) INSC 179 (05 March 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Section 153C Compliance in Income Tax Search Cases: Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Section 153C Compliance in Income Tax Search Cases: Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Assessing Officer complied with the mandatory requirements of Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before initiating proceedings against a third party based on seized documents. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law, Search

Supreme Court Upholds Section 153C Compliance in Income Tax Search Cases: Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top