Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024)

/ Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, Transfer of Property Act with Section 54, Transfer of Property Act with Section 6(h), Transfer of Property Act with Section 7

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024) Date of the Judgment: 14 October 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 769 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J., Sanjay Kumar, J. Can a claim of adverse possession succeed against a title established through a […]

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Delayed Registration: Kaushik Premkumar Mishra vs. Kanji Ravaria (2024)

/ Competency to Contract, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 85, Sale of Immovable Property, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Delayed Registration: Kaushik Premkumar Mishra vs. Kanji Ravaria (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sale deed, duly executed and presented for registration, remains valid despite a significant delay in its actual registration and whether a subsequent purchaser can claim bona fide status if the vendor had already transferred

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Delayed Registration: Kaushik Premkumar Mishra vs. Kanji Ravaria (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Retirement Age for Employees Joining Service as Minors: Gopal Prasad vs. Bihar School Examination Board (28 May 2020)

/ Age of Majority, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Retirement Age, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code

Supreme Court Addresses Retirement Age for Employees Joining Service as Minors: Gopal Prasad vs. Bihar School Examination Board (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who joined service as a minor should be retired based on a deemed age of 18 years at the time of joining, or on their actual date of birth. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Addresses Retirement Age for Employees Joining Service as Minors: Gopal Prasad vs. Bihar School Examination Board (28 May 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Non-User of Rented Premises: Nilesh Laxmichand vs. Shantaben Purushottam Kakad (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 with Section 2(32), Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 with Section 7(2)(A), Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 with Section 16(1)(c), Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 with Section 16(1)(n)

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Non-User of Rented Premises: Nilesh Laxmichand vs. Shantaben Purushottam Kakad (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can be evicted for not using the rented premises for the purpose it was let out for a continuous period of six months. CASE TYPE: Civil (Rent Control) Case Name: Nilesh Laxmichand and

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Non-User of Rented Premises: Nilesh Laxmichand vs. Shantaben Purushottam Kakad (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top