Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement but Denies Specific Performance: Tilak Raj Bakshi vs. Avinash Chand Sharma (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 with Section 22, Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 with Section 3, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 29, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 93, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement but Denies Specific Performance: Tilak Raj Bakshi vs. Avinash Chand Sharma (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a family settlement agreement containing a clause requiring written consent from all brothers before the sale of property and granting a right of first preference to the brothers is valid and enforceable, and whether specific […]

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement but Denies Specific Performance: Tilak Raj Bakshi vs. Avinash Chand Sharma (2019) Read Post »