Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Arbitration After Full and Final Settlement: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning (2024)

/ Accord and Satisfaction, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Arbitration After Full and Final Settlement: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a discharge voucher for full and final settlement bars invocation of arbitration. CASE TYPE: Insurance Law, Arbitration Law Case Name: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning Judgment Date: 18th July […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Arbitration After Full and Final Settlement: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside specific performance decree due to Limitation Act: A. Valliammai vs. K.P. Murali (2023)

/ Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 54, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 9

Supreme Court sets aside specific performance decree due to Limitation Act: A. Valliammai vs. K.P. Murali (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the suit for specific performance was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963. CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance) Case Name: A. Valliammai vs. K.P. Murali and Others [Judgment Date]: September 12,

Supreme Court sets aside specific performance decree due to Limitation Act: A. Valliammai vs. K.P. Murali (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Limitation and Lack of Readiness: Urvashi Aggarwal vs. Kushagr Ansal (2019)

/ Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 55, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 54, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 16(c)

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Limitation and Lack of Readiness: Urvashi Aggarwal vs. Kushagr Ansal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement is barred by limitation if filed after three years from the date fixed for performance, and whether the plaintiffs demonstrated readiness and willingness to

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Limitation and Lack of Readiness: Urvashi Aggarwal vs. Kushagr Ansal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Contract Dispute: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. vs. M/S. Datar Switchgear Limited & Ors. (18 January 2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Ashok Bhushan, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 39, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 53, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. vs. M/S. Datar Switchgear Limited & Ors. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Arbitral Tribunal’s award was justified in holding Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) liable for breach of contract due to non-supply of location lists, and whether the damages awarded were

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Award in Contract Dispute: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. vs. M/S. Datar Switchgear Limited & Ors. (18 January 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies maritime claims and vessel ownership in Chrisomar Corporation vs. MJR Steels (2017)

/ Admiralty Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 62, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63, Judges, Maritime Claims, Maritime Lien, R.F. Nariman, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of ownership of a vessel for enforcing maritime claims and the effect of settlement agreements on original contracts. CASE TYPE: Admiralty Law Case Name: Chrisomar Corporation vs. MJR Steels Private Limited & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 14 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 776 Judges: R.F. Nariman,

Supreme Court clarifies maritime claims and vessel ownership in Chrisomar Corporation vs. MJR Steels (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top