Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Officer’s Order on Paternity Dispute: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal (2024)

/ Burden of Proof, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, High Court Jurisdiction, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101, Revisional Powers, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 with Section 48

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Officer’s Order on Paternity Dispute: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court rightly interfered with the revisional authority’s order in a land consolidation dispute regarding the determination of paternity and succession rights. CASE TYPE: Land Consolidation Dispute, Civil Law Case Name: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal […]

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Officer’s Order on Paternity Dispute: Shambhu Chauhan vs. Ram Kirpal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns Special Court order on benami transactions: Suman L. Shah vs. The Custodian (2024)

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 102, Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 with Section 3(2), Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 with Section 9A

Supreme Court overturns Special Court order on benami transactions: Suman L. Shah vs. The Custodian (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the burden of proof lies on the Custodian to prove that a debt exists, or on the alleged debtor to prove that a debt has been repaid in cases involving benami transactions under the Special Court

Supreme Court overturns Special Court order on benami transactions: Suman L. Shah vs. The Custodian (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Property Title in Smriti Debbarma vs. Prabha Ranjan Deb Barma (2023) INSC 12

/ Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 102, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 90, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Property Title in Smriti Debbarma vs. Prabha Ranjan Deb Barma Date of the Judgment: January 4, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 12 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J. and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a claimant succeed in a property dispute based solely on the weakness of the defendant’s case? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Property Title in Smriti Debbarma vs. Prabha Ranjan Deb Barma (2023) INSC 12 Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife’s Death Case Citing Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence: Nagendra Sah vs. The State of Bihar (2021) INSC 597 (14 September 2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife’s Death Case Citing Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 597 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a conviction for murder be sustained solely on the basis of a post-mortem report, especially when other evidence suggests an alternative explanation?

Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife’s Death Case Citing Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence: Nagendra Sah vs. The State of Bihar (2021) INSC 597 (14 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on circumstantial evidence: Satish Nirankari vs. State of Rajasthan (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 313, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 374, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 101, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 309, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed murder, or if the death was a suicide. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Satish Nirankari vs. State of Rajasthan Judgment Date: 09 June 2017 Date of the Judgment: 09 June 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 545 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J.

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on circumstantial evidence: Satish Nirankari vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top