Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 57

Supreme Court enhances compensation for motor accident claimants: Manusha Sreekumar & Ors. vs. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Compensation, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 57, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 168, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Claimants: Manusha Sreekumar vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: October 17, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 903 Judges: Surya Kant, J. and Aniruddha Bose, J. Can a High Court reduce the compensation awarded by a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, especially when sufficient evidence of […]

Supreme Court enhances compensation for motor accident claimants: Manusha Sreekumar & Ors. vs. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies use of Parliamentary Committee Reports in Public Interest Litigations (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 105, Constitutional Law with Article 122, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 57, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 74, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Use of Parliamentary Committee Reports in Public Interest Litigations (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility and use of Parliamentary Standing Committee reports in court proceedings. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law Case Name: Kalpana Mehta and others v. Union of India and others Judgment Date: May 9, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court clarifies use of Parliamentary Committee Reports in Public Interest Litigations (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top