Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 92

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Settles Land Dispute: Damodhar Narayan Sawale vs. Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 6A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 9, Counterclaim, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 91, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 92, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 with Section 36A, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 with Section 36B, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 with Section 9(1), Sale, Transfer of Property, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Settles Land Dispute: Damodhar Narayan Sawale vs. Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a registered sale deed and the applicability of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs. vs. Shri Tejrao Bajirao […]

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Settles Land Dispute: Damodhar Narayan Sawale vs. Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Despite Claims of Misrepresentation: Placido Francisco Pinto vs. Jose Francisco Pinto (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 4, Hemant Gupta, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 25, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 91, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 92, Judges, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Despite Claims of Misrepresentation: Placido Francisco Pinto vs. Jose Francisco Pinto (2021) Date of the Judgment: September 30, 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 711 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J. and V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a registered sale deed be invalidated based on claims of misrepresentation and lack of consideration, especially when the

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Despite Claims of Misrepresentation: Placido Francisco Pinto vs. Jose Francisco Pinto (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between a business license and a rent agreement in Mangala Waman Karandikar vs. Prakash Damodar Ranade (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 92, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 95, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Business License vs. Rent Agreement: Mangala Waman Karandikar vs. Prakash Damodar Ranade (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an agreement to run an existing business constitutes a license of the business itself or a lease of the premises where the business is located. CASE TYPE: Civil Law (Contractual Dispute) Case Name: Mangala Waman Karandikar

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between a business license and a rent agreement in Mangala Waman Karandikar vs. Prakash Damodar Ranade (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top