Indian Evidence Act

Supreme Court overturns conviction in NDPS case due to flawed evidence: Naresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2017)

/ Indian Evidence Act, Indian Evidence Act with Section 114, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Navin Sinha, NDPS Act with Section 20, NDPS Act with Section 35, NDPS Act with Section 61

The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical question regarding the reliability of evidence in cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. This case highlights the importance of independent witness testimony and the prosecution’s burden of proof. The bench comprised Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Navin Sinha, with the judgment authored by […]

Supreme Court overturns conviction in NDPS case due to flawed evidence: Naresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rules for amending written statements in property disputes: Gautam Sarup vs. Leela Jetly (2008)

/ Amendment of Pleadings, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure with Order VIII Rule 5, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Evidence Act with Section 58, Judges, S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., V.S. Sirpurkar, J. Can a party be allowed to amend their written statement to retract admissions made earlier? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a property dispute arising from a will. The court examined the circumstances under which

Supreme Court clarifies rules for amending written statements in property disputes: Gautam Sarup vs. Leela Jetly (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top