Supreme Court Refuses Lease Extension for Obstructed Mining Periods, Orders Refund: Dharmendra Kumar Singh vs. State of UP (28 October 2020)

/ Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ), Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Forest Act, 1927, Indian Forest Act, 1927 with Section 20, Indian Forest Act, 1927 with Section 4, Judges, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 3(e), Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Uttar Pradesh Mining Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963, Uttar Pradesh Mining Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 with Rule 40(h), Uttar Pradesh Mining Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 with Rule 68

Supreme Court Refuses Lease Extension for Obstructed Mining Periods, Orders Refund: Dharmendra Kumar Singh vs. State of UP (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mining leases should be extended for the period during which operations were halted due to court orders, or if a refund of lease amounts is sufficient. CASE TYPE: Mining Law, Environmental Law Case […]

Supreme Court Refuses Lease Extension for Obstructed Mining Periods, Orders Refund: Dharmendra Kumar Singh vs. State of UP (28 October 2020) Read Post »