Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 48

Supreme Court Clarifies Profit Sharing After Dissolution of Partnership: Crystal Transport vs. Fathima Fareedunisa (2024)

/ Dissolution of Partnership, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 37, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 48

Supreme Court Clarifies Profit Sharing After Dissolution of Partnership: Crystal Transport vs. Fathima Fareedunisa (2024) Date of the Judgment: November 8, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 859 Judges: Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, CJI., J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a partner claim a share of profits from a company that continues to use the partnership’s assets […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Profit Sharing After Dissolution of Partnership: Crystal Transport vs. Fathima Fareedunisa (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Landlord-Tenant Dispute: Vinay Eknath Lad vs. Chiu Mao Chen (2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Deepak Gupta, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 116, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 45(1), Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 48, Judges, Transfer of Property Act, Transfer of Property Act with Section 106, Transfer of Property Act with Section 109

Supreme Court Remands Landlord-Tenant Dispute: Vinay Eknath Lad vs. Chiu Mao Chen (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the original plaintiffs had the locus to institute a suit for eviction of a tenant without proper attornment or public notice of change of ownership. CASE TYPE: Civil (Landlord-Tenant Dispute) Case Name: Vinay Eknath Lad vs. Chiu Mao Chen

Supreme Court Remands Landlord-Tenant Dispute: Vinay Eknath Lad vs. Chiu Mao Chen (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top