Criminal Conspiracy

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Councillor Murder Case: Rajender vs. State (2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Conspiracy, Criminal Law, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 65-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Murder

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Councillor Murder Case: Rajender vs. State (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether circumstantial evidence was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rajender @ Rajesh @ Raju vs. State (NCT of Delhi) Judgment Date: 24 October 2019 Date of the Judgment: 24 […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Councillor Murder Case: Rajender vs. State (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of conspiracy proof: Dashrath Singh Chauhan vs. CBI (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Criminal Conspiracy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of conspiracy proof: Dashrath Singh Chauhan vs. CBI (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a public servant can be convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 when the charge of criminal conspiracy is not proved and the bribe money was accepted by a co-accused. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of conspiracy proof: Dashrath Singh Chauhan vs. CBI (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act in Goa Power Rebate Case: Mauvin Godinho vs. State of Goa (2018) INSC 21

/ Criminal Conspiracy, Criminal Misconduct, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(i), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(ii), S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act in Goa Power Rebate Case Date of the Judgment: January 17, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 21 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can public officials be charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly misusing their positions to grant undue benefits to private

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act in Goa Power Rebate Case: Mauvin Godinho vs. State of Goa (2018) INSC 21 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case: Birbal Choudhary vs. State of Bihar (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Criminal Conspiracy, Criminal Law, Dacoity, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 395, Judges, Kidnapping, R. K. Agrawal

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused were rightly convicted for kidnapping for ransom under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Kidnapping, Dacoity Case Name: Birbal Choudhary @ Mukhiya Jee vs. State of Bihar [Judgment Date]: October 6, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 6, 2017 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case: Birbal Choudhary vs. State of Bihar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Decision on Witness Re-examination in Criminal Case: Ratanlal vs. Prahlad Jat & Ors (2017)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 311, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Criminal Conspiracy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer, Witness Examination

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trial court can reject a witness’s application for re-examination under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) if the application is made after a significant delay and without sufficient explanation, especially when the witness had previously supported the prosecution’s case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Ratanlal vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Decision on Witness Re-examination in Criminal Case: Ratanlal vs. Prahlad Jat & Ors (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top