Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizes Eye Witness Testimony: State of U.P. vs. Raghuvir (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility of eye witness testimony and ballistic evidence in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of U.P. vs. Raghuvir and Anr. Judgment Date: 13 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 13 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1048 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can inconsistencies in […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizes Eye Witness Testimony: State of U.P. vs. Raghuvir (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking SIT Probe in Alleged Bribery Case: Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Investigation Team (SIT) should be constituted to investigate allegations of bribery for favorable court orders. CASE TYPE: Criminal Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms vs. Union of India and Others Judgment Date: 1 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 1 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking SIT Probe in Alleged Bribery Case: Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Multiple FIRs Allowed in Co-operative Society Fraud: Supreme Court Judgment (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 15, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 976 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can multiple FIRs be filed for similar offenses involving different entities but the same accused? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving alleged fraud in multiple co-operative housing societies. The

Multiple FIRs Allowed in Co-operative Society Fraud: Supreme Court Judgment (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Shantanu Sitaram vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 can be upheld when the charge under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is not proven. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Shantanu Sitaram @ Anil Divekar vs. The State of Maharashtra Judgment Date: 22 September

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Shantanu Sitaram vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in Haryana hooch tragedy case: State of Haryana vs. Krishan & Anr. (2017) INSC 488

LEGAL ISSUE: Criminal liability for sale of spurious liquor leading to death and grievous injury. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of Haryana vs. Krishan & Anr. Judgment Date: June 09, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: June 09, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 488 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. (authored by A.K.

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in Haryana hooch tragedy case: State of Haryana vs. Krishan & Anr. (2017) INSC 488 Read Post »

Supreme Court allows broadcast of “Crime Patrol” episode related to JBT Teachers Scam: Vidya Dhar vs. Multi Screen Media (2013) INSC 376

Date of the Judgment: 03 May 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 376 Judges: Altamas Kabir, C.J.I., Anil R. Dave, J., Vikramajit Sen, J. Can a television show broadcast a dramatized version of a case when an appeal is pending? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a television show based on

Supreme Court allows broadcast of “Crime Patrol” episode related to JBT Teachers Scam: Vidya Dhar vs. Multi Screen Media (2013) INSC 376 Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order for violating natural justice in a property dispute case: Prabha Mathur & Anr. vs. Pramod Aggarwal & Ors. (26 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed whether a High Court can set aside orders of lower courts without providing an opportunity for all parties to be heard. This issue arose from a property dispute where the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad reversed decisions made by lower

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order for violating natural justice in a property dispute case: Prabha Mathur & Anr. vs. Pramod Aggarwal & Ors. (26 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles procedure for complaints alleging fraud: Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji (23 September 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When a complaint alleging fraud and other related offences is filed, what procedure should a Magistrate follow? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji. The core issue

Supreme Court settles procedure for complaints alleging fraud: Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants limited relief to under-trial prisoner in Pramod Kumar Saxena vs. Union of India (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Citation: Pramod Kumar Saxena v. Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 58 of 2007 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., D.K. Jain, J. What happens when an individual is stuck in jail for over a decade while awaiting trial? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical

Supreme Court grants limited relief to under-trial prisoner in Pramod Kumar Saxena vs. Union of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Official Secrets Act Case: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh (08 August 2003)

Date of the Judgment: 08 August 2003 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, J. and H. K. Sema, J. Can possessing a classified document, even without proof of communication to another party, be sufficient to establish guilt under the Official Secrets Act? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Official Secrets Act Case: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh (08 August 2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top