Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on circumstantial evidence: Satish Nirankari vs. State of Rajasthan (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed murder, or if the death was a suicide. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Satish Nirankari vs. State of Rajasthan Judgment Date: 09 June 2017 Date of the Judgment: 09 June 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 545 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. […]

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on circumstantial evidence: Satish Nirankari vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in Haryana hooch tragedy case: State of Haryana vs. Krishan & Anr. (2017) INSC 488

LEGAL ISSUE: Criminal liability for sale of spurious liquor leading to death and grievous injury. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of Haryana vs. Krishan & Anr. Judgment Date: June 09, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: June 09, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 488 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. (authored by A.K.

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in Haryana hooch tragedy case: State of Haryana vs. Krishan & Anr. (2017) INSC 488 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Acquits One Accused: State of Haryana vs. Bira @ Bhira (24 April 2017)

Can the testimony of eyewitnesses be partially accepted in a criminal case? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a murder. The Court upheld the conviction of two accused persons while acquitting the third. This judgment highlights the importance of corroborative evidence in criminal cases. The bench comprised Justices

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Acquits One Accused: State of Haryana vs. Bira @ Bhira (24 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. vs. State of A.P. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the Trial Court’s order of acquittal in a double murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. vs. State of A.P. Judgment Date: 13 April 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 April 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 367 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J.,

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. vs. State of A.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Consideration of Murder Charge in Dowry Death Case: Sarada Prasanna Dalai vs. Inspector General of Police (2017) INSC 315

Can a trial court consider adding a murder charge (Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code) in a dowry death case, even after the police have filed a charge sheet for lesser offenses? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving the death of a woman named Sulekha Dalai. The court

Supreme Court Orders Consideration of Murder Charge in Dowry Death Case: Sarada Prasanna Dalai vs. Inspector General of Police (2017) INSC 315 Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder in a sudden fight case: Surain Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) INSC 361 (10 April 2017)

Can a conviction for murder be reduced to culpable homicide if the death occurred during a sudden fight? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, examining the nuances of Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. This judgment clarifies the circumstances under which a killing during a sudden fight

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder in a sudden fight case: Surain Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) INSC 361 (10 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Bhagwan Jagannath Markad vs. State of Maharashtra (2016)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the acquittal of the appellants on the basis of evidence available on record, particularly when the trial court had acquitted the accused citing inconsistencies and contradictions in the prosecution’s case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Murder, Unlawful Assembly Case Name: Bhagwan Jagannath Markad & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Bhagwan Jagannath Markad vs. State of Maharashtra (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Eyewitness Testimony: Gulzari Lal vs. State of Haryana (2016) INSC 29 (2 February 2016)

Can a conviction for murder be upheld based on a dying declaration and eyewitness testimony? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case where the accused challenged his conviction. This case highlights the importance of dying declarations and eyewitness accounts in criminal trials. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Eyewitness Testimony: Gulzari Lal vs. State of Haryana (2016) INSC 29 (2 February 2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide: Nankaunoo vs. State of U.P. (2016)

Can a conviction for murder be reduced to culpable homicide if the injury, though fatal, was inflicted on a non-vital part of the body? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Nankaunoo vs. State of U.P.. The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide: Nankaunoo vs. State of U.P. (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case: Khim Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand (2014)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether circumstantial evidence was sufficient to convict the accused for the murder of his wife. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Khim Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand Judgment Date: 8th July 2014 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 8th July 2014 Citation: 2014 INSC 487 Judges: Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya and Justice V. Gopala Gowda

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case: Khim Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand (2014) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Lathi Attack Case: Badal Murmu vs. State of West Bengal (2014)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused, who assaulted the deceased with lathis, should be convicted for murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Badal Murmu and Ors. vs. State of West Bengal Judgment Date: 5th February 2014 Date of the Judgment: 5th February 2014 Citation: (2014) INSC 75 Judges:

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Lathi Attack Case: Badal Murmu vs. State of West Bengal (2014) Read Post »

Supreme Court Decides Juvenile Status Under the JJ Act: Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel vs. State of Gujarat (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 18, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 521 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J., Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Can a person who was not considered a juvenile under the old law, be considered a juvenile under the new law? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where the accused was a few

Supreme Court Decides Juvenile Status Under the JJ Act: Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel vs. State of Gujarat (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top