Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302

Supreme Court Clarifies Life Imprisonment: Lazer vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 15, 2013 Citation: Not Available Judges: H.L. Gokhale, J and Madan B. Lokur, J. Can a convict who has served over 26 years in prison be released? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where the petitioner sought release based on the length of his imprisonment. The court […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Life Imprisonment: Lazer vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Murder Conviction based on Circumstantial Evidence

Date of the Judgment: July 9, 2013 Citation: Not Available Judges: T.S. Thakur, J. and Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. Can a High Court dismiss an appeal without properly discussing the questions raised by the appellants? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case involving a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence. The Court

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Murder Conviction based on Circumstantial Evidence Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies charge framing under Section 302 and 304B IPC in dowry death cases: Jasvinder Saini & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 477 (2 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 2 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 477 Judges: T.S. Thakur, J., Ranjana Prakash Desai, J. Can a trial court automatically add a murder charge (Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code) in every dowry death case (Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code)? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court clarifies charge framing under Section 302 and 304B IPC in dowry death cases: Jasvinder Saini & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 477 (2 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Rafique @ Rauf & Others vs. State of U.P. (2 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 2 July 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 495 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, JJ. Can a statement recorded by a police officer under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 be considered a dying declaration? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a criminal

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Rafique @ Rauf & Others vs. State of U.P. (2 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Murder Case for Fresh Hearing: Majjal vs. State of Haryana (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 2, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 476 Judges: Justice G.S. Singhvi, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, and Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde. Is a High Court judgment valid if it does not properly analyze the evidence in a criminal appeal? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case where a man

Supreme Court Remands Murder Case for Fresh Hearing: Majjal vs. State of Haryana (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Ship Murder Case: Majendran Langeswaran vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 429

Date of the Judgment: July 1, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 429 Judges: Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice M.Y. Eqbal Can a conviction be upheld when key evidence is missing and the chain of events is incomplete? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a murder on a cargo ship.

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Ship Murder Case: Majendran Langeswaran vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 429 Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on inconsistent dying declarations: Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (29 May 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 29 May 2013 Citation: Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, Criminal Appeal No.248 of 2007 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. and Dipak Misra, J. Can a conviction for murder be sustained when the primary evidence, the dying declarations of the deceased, are inconsistent? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on inconsistent dying declarations: Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (29 May 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Land Dispute Case: Yogendra vs. State of Rajasthan (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 21, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 378 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. and Dipak Misra, J. Can a conviction be upheld when some co-accused are acquitted based on the same evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a violent land dispute. The Court upheld the

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Land Dispute Case: Yogendra vs. State of Rajasthan (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eye-Witness Testimony: Palwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 8, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 368 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J., Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. Can an eye-witness account alone be sufficient to convict a person for murder? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a criminal appeal, examining the reliability of an eye-witness and the corroborative

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eye-Witness Testimony: Palwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab (2013) Read Post »

Dying Declaration Reliability: Supreme Court overturns conviction in State of Rajasthan vs. Shravan Ram (2013)

LEGAL ISSUE: The reliability and evidentiary value of multiple dying declarations. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of Rajasthan vs. Shravan Ram & Anr. Judgment Date: May 1, 2013 Date of the Judgment: May 1, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 317 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J., Dipak Misra, J. Can a conviction be based solely on

Dying Declaration Reliability: Supreme Court overturns conviction in State of Rajasthan vs. Shravan Ram (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Dying Declaration in Murder Case: Abrar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2010)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be solely based on a dying declaration, especially when there are minor discrepancies in multiple dying declarations. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Murder Case Name: Abrar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [Judgment Date]: 16th December 2010 Date of the Judgment: 16th December 2010 Citation: Not Available in the

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Dying Declaration in Murder Case: Abrar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2010) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide in sudden fight case: Sangh Araj Bhogappa Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra (2010)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a fatal injury inflicted during a sudden fight without premeditation constitutes murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Sangh Araj Bhogappa Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra. Judgment Date: 26th October 2010 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 26th October 2010 Citation: 2010(13) SCR 376 Judges: Hon’ble

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide in sudden fight case: Sangh Araj Bhogappa Kamble vs. State of Maharashtra (2010) Read Post »

Scroll to Top