Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 149 IPC in unlawful assembly case: Maranadu and Anr. vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. When can presence in an unlawful assembly lead to conviction, even without direct participation in the crime? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in Maranadu and Anr. v. State […]

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 149 IPC in unlawful assembly case: Maranadu and Anr. vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles culpability in free fights: Bachan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Citation: [Not provided in the document] Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can individuals involved in a ‘free fight’, where both parties willingly engage in violence, be held equally responsible for the resulting deaths? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Bachan Singh

Supreme Court settles culpability in free fights: Bachan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Juvenile Justice Act in murder case: Ranjit Singh vs. State of Haryana (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1458 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.349 of 2008) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. When does the Juvenile Justice Act apply in cases of serious crimes like murder? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in Ranjit Singh

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Juvenile Justice Act in murder case: Ranjit Singh vs. State of Haryana (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces life sentence to 10 years in culpable homicide case: Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil vs. State of Maharashtra (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When does a single blow resulting in death constitute murder versus culpable homicide? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra. The court examined

Supreme Court reduces life sentence to 10 years in culpable homicide case: Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil vs. State of Maharashtra (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits father and brother in alleged throttling case: Inspector of Police vs. Muthusamy (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Citation: [Not Available from Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Did the High Court err in acquitting the accused based on unreliable evidence and discrepancies in the prosecution’s case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in an appeal against a judgment by the Madras

Supreme Court acquits father and brother in alleged throttling case: Inspector of Police vs. Muthusamy (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on weak circumstantial evidence: Nur Islam Khan vs. State of West Bengal (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 09, 2008 Judges: B.N. Agrawal and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. Can a conviction for murder be sustained solely on the basis of circumstantial evidence, specifically when the accused was last seen with the deceased? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a criminal appeal, ultimately acquitting the

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on weak circumstantial evidence: Nur Islam Khan vs. State of West Bengal (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court alters conviction in a murder case based on individual roles: Kaparapu Apparao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 09, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: B.N. Agrawal, J. and Harjit Singh Bedi, J. In a case of multiple accused convicted for murder, can the nature of individual participation alter the conviction? The Supreme Court addressed this question in Kaparapu Apparao & Ors. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,

Supreme Court alters conviction in a murder case based on individual roles: Kaparapu Apparao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Inter-Group Violence: Nishan Singh vs. State of Punjab (2008)

Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, J and Harjit Singh Bedi, J Did a procedural lapse during trial impact justice in a murder case? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the appeal of Nishan Singh v. State of Punjab. This case arose from a series of interconnected

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Inter-Group Violence: Nishan Singh vs. State of Punjab (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies evidentiary standards in murder cases based on circumstantial evidence: Benjamin vs. State (2008)

Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2008 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 76 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 863 of 2007) Judges: S.B. Sinha, J. and HARJIT SINGH BEDI, J. In a case revolving around circumstantial evidence, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether the High Court correctly upheld the conviction of

Supreme Court clarifies evidentiary standards in murder cases based on circumstantial evidence: Benjamin vs. State (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces sentence in assault case due to delay: Venkategowda & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka (2006)

Date of the Judgment: 06/11/2006 Citation: Appeal (crl.) 851 of 2006 Judges: A. K. Mathur & Lokeshwar Singh Panta In a case involving a violent assault, the Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether the High Court was justified in convicting the accused based on the evidence presented, and also considered the impact

Supreme Court reduces sentence in assault case due to delay: Venkategowda & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka (2006) Read Post »

Suresh Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wedding Altercation Case (2005)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21st July 2005 Citation: Appeal (crl.) 746 of 2003 Judges: P. Venkatarama Reddi and D.M. Dharmadhikari Can a sudden quarrel during a wedding celebration lead to a murder conviction? The Supreme Court of India addressed this grim scenario in Suresh Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, a case arising from

Suresh Chandra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wedding Altercation Case (2005) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Ram Kishan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2004)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10/09/2004 Judges: K.G. Balakrishnan and Dr. AR. Lakshmanan Can eyewitness testimony alone be sufficient to uphold a murder conviction, even when there are challenges to the medical evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Ram Kishan & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Ram Kishan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2004) Read Post »

Scroll to Top