Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bank fraud case, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence: Hiralal Babulal Soni vs. State of Maharashtra (25 February 2025)

/ B.R. Gavai, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 106, Evidence Act with Section 114, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, K.V. Viswanathan, Offences Against Property, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 266 Judges: B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, K.V. Viswanathan The Supreme Court of India recently addressed a case involving a large-scale fraud committed through fake Telegraphic Transfers (TTs) at a Vijaya Bank branch in Maharashtra. The central question was whether the accused, Nandkumar Babulal Soni, […]

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bank fraud case, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence: Hiralal Babulal Soni vs. State of Maharashtra (25 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court expunges remarks against Additional District Judge in Delhi judicial service: Sonu Agnihotri vs. Chandra Shekhar & Ors. (2024) INSC 888 (22 November 2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 41A, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 177, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 380, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411

Supreme Court expunges remarks against Additional District Judge in Delhi judicial service: Sonu Agnihotri vs. Chandra Shekhar & Ors. (2024) INSC 888 (22 November 2024) Date of the Judgment: 22 November 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 888 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J., Augustine George Masih, J. Can a High Court make adverse remarks

Supreme Court expunges remarks against Additional District Judge in Delhi judicial service: Sonu Agnihotri vs. Chandra Shekhar & Ors. (2024) INSC 888 (22 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Concurrent Sentences in Electricity Theft Case: Iqram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 265-G, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 427, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 136, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Plea Bargaining

Supreme Court Orders Concurrent Sentences in Electricity Theft Case: Iqram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether sentences for multiple convictions should run consecutively or concurrently when no specific direction is given by the trial court under Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Iqram

Supreme Court Orders Concurrent Sentences in Electricity Theft Case: Iqram vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 411 IPC due to lack of evidence of knowledge of stolen property: Shiv Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 114, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 24, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Offences Relating to Property

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 411 IPC due to lack of evidence of knowledge of stolen property: Shiv Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the essential ingredients of Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 are met when the prosecution fails to prove that the accused had knowledge that

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 411 IPC due to lack of evidence of knowledge of stolen property: Shiv Kumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Police Constable Job Due to Prior Criminal Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bunty (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 392, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411, Judges, Navin Sinha, Police Recruitment, Screening Committee, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Police Constable Job Due to Prior Criminal Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bunty (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate can be denied a police constable position based on a prior criminal case where they were acquitted with the benefit of doubt. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Criminal Law. Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Police Constable Job Due to Prior Criminal Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bunty (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top