Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 448

Supreme Court quashes criminal case against landlords in property dispute: Vishnu Kumar Shukla vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 1026 (28 November 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 340, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 448, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 463, Inherent Powers of High Court, Offences Related to Property

Supreme Court quashes criminal case against landlords in property dispute: Vishnu Kumar Shukla vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 1026 (28 November 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal case for house-trespass can be sustained against a landlord when the tenant’s claim of possession is based on a forged document. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: […]

Supreme Court quashes criminal case against landlords in property dispute: Vishnu Kumar Shukla vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 1026 (28 November 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Summons of Additional Accused under Section 319 CrPC: Periyasami & Ors. vs. S. Nallasamy (2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 319, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 147, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 448, Judges

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court Order: Periyasami & Ors. vs. S. Nallasamy (2019) Date of the Judgment: March 14, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 249 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J., Hemant Gupta, J. Can a trial court summon additional individuals as accused based solely on witness statements during trial, even if their names were not

Supreme Court Rejects Summons of Additional Accused under Section 319 CrPC: Periyasami & Ors. vs. S. Nallasamy (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court recalls order in divorce case due to non-compliance of alimony: Chintala Syamala vs. Chintala Venkata Satyanarayana Rao (28 July 2008)

/ Alimony, B.N. Agrawal, Divorce, Family Law, G.S. Singhvi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 379, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 448, Judges

Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2008 Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal, Justice G.S. Singhvi Can a court reverse its decision if one party fails to uphold their promises? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where a husband failed to pay the agreed-upon alimony to his wife. This led the Court

Supreme Court recalls order in divorce case due to non-compliance of alimony: Chintala Syamala vs. Chintala Venkata Satyanarayana Rao (28 July 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top