Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465

Supreme Court Allows Counter FIR in Fraud Case: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Judges, Multiple FIRs, Offences Relating to Property, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Allows Counter FIR in Fraud Case: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second FIR is maintainable if it is a counter-complaint arising from the same incident. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 19, 2018 Date of the […]

Supreme Court Allows Counter FIR in Fraud Case: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds FIR, Rejects Quashing in Land Fraud Case: Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3

Supreme Court Upholds FIR, Rejects Quashing in Land Fraud Case: Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2018) Date of the Judgment: January 5, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 12 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can a High Court quash an entire FIR after partially quashing it? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds FIR, Rejects Quashing in Land Fraud Case: Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Embezzlement Case, Modifies Sentence: Naresh Chaubey vs CBI (2017)

/ Arun Mishra, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 471, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(c), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the Appellant for misappropriation and embezzlement of public funds was valid. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Naresh Chaubey vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Judgment Date: 16 November 2017 Date of the Judgment: 16 November 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 948 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., L. Nageswara Rao, J. Can a

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Embezzlement Case, Modifies Sentence: Naresh Chaubey vs CBI (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies concurrent sentencing for offences arising from single transaction: P.N. Mohanan Nair vs. State of Kerala (2017)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 427, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 409, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 471, Judges, Navin Sinha, Prevention of Corruption Act, Prevention of Corruption Act with Section 13, Ranjan Gogoi

Can sentences for multiple offences arising from a single transaction run concurrently? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a government employee convicted of misappropriation. The court clarified the application of Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) regarding concurrent sentencing. This judgment provides clarity on how sentences

Supreme Court clarifies concurrent sentencing for offences arising from single transaction: P.N. Mohanan Nair vs. State of Kerala (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Document Examination in Lilavati Hospital Trust Case (2008)

/ Altamas Kabir, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 94, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Offences Relating to Documents

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (crl.) 330 of 2008 Judges: Altamas Kabir, J. and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. The Supreme Court addressed the extent to which documents could be examined in a case involving allegations of forgery within the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust. The core issue revolved around whether

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Document Examination in Lilavati Hospital Trust Case (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top