Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Atrocity Case: Daulatram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 313, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307/34, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma, Offences Against Human Body, Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(2)(v)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Does familial relation to a victim automatically discredit a witness’s testimony? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Daulatram S/o Sadram Teli v. State of Chhattisgarh, concerning a conviction under Section 302 […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Atrocity Case: Daulatram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles culpability in free fights: Bachan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar (2008)

/ Arms Act, Arms Act with Section 25(a), Arms Act with Section 27, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 172, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 313, Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, S.B. Sinha

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Citation: [Not provided in the document] Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can individuals involved in a ‘free fight’, where both parties willingly engage in violence, be held equally responsible for the resulting deaths? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Bachan Singh

Supreme Court settles culpability in free fights: Bachan Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top