Indian Penal Code, 1860

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Bail Order in Double Murder Case: Hari Om Yadav vs. Dinesh Singh Jaat (2013) INSC 487 (12 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 12 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 487 Judges: Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Dipak Misra Can a High Court grant bail without providing any reasons? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a criminal appeal concerning a double murder case. The court emphasized that a reasoned order is essential for […]

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Bail Order in Double Murder Case: Hari Om Yadav vs. Dinesh Singh Jaat (2013) INSC 487 (12 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Murder Conviction based on Circumstantial Evidence

Date of the Judgment: July 9, 2013 Citation: Not Available Judges: T.S. Thakur, J. and Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. Can a High Court dismiss an appeal without properly discussing the questions raised by the appellants? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case involving a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence. The Court

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Murder Conviction based on Circumstantial Evidence Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Police Custody Rape Case: Charanjit & Ors. vs. State of Punjab (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 4, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 497 Judges: A. K. Patnaik, J. and Gyan Sudha Misra, J. Can police officers be convicted for raping a woman in their custody? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case where police officers were accused of raping a woman while

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Police Custody Rape Case: Charanjit & Ors. vs. State of Punjab (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies charge framing under Section 302 and 304B IPC in dowry death cases: Jasvinder Saini & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 477 (2 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 2 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 477 Judges: T.S. Thakur, J., Ranjana Prakash Desai, J. Can a trial court automatically add a murder charge (Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code) in every dowry death case (Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code)? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court clarifies charge framing under Section 302 and 304B IPC in dowry death cases: Jasvinder Saini & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 477 (2 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Rafique @ Rauf & Others vs. State of U.P. (2 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 2 July 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 495 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, JJ. Can a statement recorded by a police officer under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 be considered a dying declaration? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a criminal

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Rafique @ Rauf & Others vs. State of U.P. (2 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Murder Case for Fresh Hearing: Majjal vs. State of Haryana (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 2, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 476 Judges: Justice G.S. Singhvi, Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, and Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde. Is a High Court judgment valid if it does not properly analyze the evidence in a criminal appeal? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case where a man

Supreme Court Remands Murder Case for Fresh Hearing: Majjal vs. State of Haryana (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Ship Murder Case: Majendran Langeswaran vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 429

Date of the Judgment: July 1, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 429 Judges: Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice M.Y. Eqbal Can a conviction be upheld when key evidence is missing and the chain of events is incomplete? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a murder on a cargo ship.

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Ship Murder Case: Majendran Langeswaran vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2013) INSC 429 Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on inconsistent dying declarations: Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (29 May 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 29 May 2013 Citation: Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, Criminal Appeal No.248 of 2007 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. and Dipak Misra, J. Can a conviction for murder be sustained when the primary evidence, the dying declarations of the deceased, are inconsistent? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on inconsistent dying declarations: Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (29 May 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Land Dispute Case: Yogendra vs. State of Rajasthan (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 21, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 378 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. and Dipak Misra, J. Can a conviction be upheld when some co-accused are acquitted based on the same evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a violent land dispute. The Court upheld the

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Land Dispute Case: Yogendra vs. State of Rajasthan (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Sentence Reduction in Rape Case: State of Haryana vs. Janak Singh (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 354 Judges: G.S. Singhvi, J. and Ranjana Prakash Desai, J. Can a High Court reduce a rape sentence below the statutory minimum without providing specific reasons? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a recent case. The court emphasized that rape is

Supreme Court Rejects Sentence Reduction in Rape Case: State of Haryana vs. Janak Singh (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 354 IPC in molestation case: P. Ramaswamy vs. State (2013)

Date of the Judgment: 9th May 2013 Citation: P. Ramaswamy vs. State (U.T.) of Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Criminal Appeal No. 747 of 2013, 2013 INSC 326 Judges: Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai Can a case of molestation be resolved through a compromise? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 354 IPC in molestation case: P. Ramaswamy vs. State (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eye-Witness Testimony: Palwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 8, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 368 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J., Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. Can an eye-witness account alone be sufficient to convict a person for murder? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a criminal appeal, examining the reliability of an eye-witness and the corroborative

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eye-Witness Testimony: Palwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top