Indian Penal Code, 1860

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. vs. State of A.P. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the Trial Court’s order of acquittal in a double murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. vs. State of A.P. Judgment Date: 13 April 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 April 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 367 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sudha Renukaiah & Ors. vs. State of A.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Consideration of Murder Charge in Dowry Death Case: Sarada Prasanna Dalai vs. Inspector General of Police (2017) INSC 315

Can a trial court consider adding a murder charge (Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code) in a dowry death case, even after the police have filed a charge sheet for lesser offenses? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving the death of a woman named Sulekha Dalai. The court

Supreme Court Orders Consideration of Murder Charge in Dowry Death Case: Sarada Prasanna Dalai vs. Inspector General of Police (2017) INSC 315 Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder in a sudden fight case: Surain Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) INSC 361 (10 April 2017)

Can a conviction for murder be reduced to culpable homicide if the death occurred during a sudden fight? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, examining the nuances of Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. This judgment clarifies the circumstances under which a killing during a sudden fight

Supreme Court reduces murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder in a sudden fight case: Surain Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) INSC 361 (10 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case: Surajsinh vs. State of Gujarat (2017)

Can a conviction for kidnapping for ransom be upheld based on a child witness testimony and circumstantial evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Surajsinh Alias Sonu Surajsinh Collectorsinh Alias Sevaram Rajput vs. State of Gujarat. This case involved the kidnapping of a seven-year-old boy and subsequent demands for

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case: Surajsinh vs. State of Gujarat (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Uphaar Tragedy Case: Fine Imposed Instead of Additional Jail Time

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sentence of imprisonment can be substituted with a fine, and the extent of punishment for offences under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Sushil Ansal and Another Judgment Date: 9th February 2017 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Uphaar Tragedy Case: Fine Imposed Instead of Additional Jail Time Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Bhagwan Jagannath Markad vs. State of Maharashtra (2016)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the acquittal of the appellants on the basis of evidence available on record, particularly when the trial court had acquitted the accused citing inconsistencies and contradictions in the prosecution’s case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Murder, Unlawful Assembly Case Name: Bhagwan Jagannath Markad & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Bhagwan Jagannath Markad vs. State of Maharashtra (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes attachment order against deceased’s property: U. Subhadramma vs. State of A.P. (2016)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether property of a person who died during a criminal trial can be attached under the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: U. Subhadramma & Ors. vs State of A.P. rep. by Pub. Prosecutor & Anr. Judgment Date: 4th July, 2016 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 4th July,

Supreme Court quashes attachment order against deceased’s property: U. Subhadramma vs. State of A.P. (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Eyewitness Testimony: Gulzari Lal vs. State of Haryana (2016) INSC 29 (2 February 2016)

Can a conviction for murder be upheld based on a dying declaration and eyewitness testimony? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case where the accused challenged his conviction. This case highlights the importance of dying declarations and eyewitness accounts in criminal trials. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Eyewitness Testimony: Gulzari Lal vs. State of Haryana (2016) INSC 29 (2 February 2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide: Nankaunoo vs. State of U.P. (2016)

Can a conviction for murder be reduced to culpable homicide if the injury, though fatal, was inflicted on a non-vital part of the body? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Nankaunoo vs. State of U.P.. The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide: Nankaunoo vs. State of U.P. (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurer’s Liability Despite Overloading: Lakhmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance (2016)

Can an insurance company deny a claim if a vehicle was carrying more passengers than permitted? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case. This case explores the limits of insurance policy terms and conditions. The court examined whether a minor violation of policy terms can invalidate an insurance claim. The

Supreme Court Upholds Insurer’s Liability Despite Overloading: Lakhmi Chand vs. Reliance General Insurance (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes perjury proceedings against ballistics expert: Prem Sagar Manocha vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2016) INSC 9 (6 January 2016)

Can a ballistics expert be charged with perjury for changing his opinion during court testimony? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case arising from the infamous Jessica Lal murder case. The Court quashed proceedings against a ballistics expert, emphasizing the nature of expert testimony. The judgment was delivered by a

Supreme Court quashes perjury proceedings against ballistics expert: Prem Sagar Manocha vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2016) INSC 9 (6 January 2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction for cheating and criminal intimidation in Tilak Raj vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2016)

Can a conviction for cheating and criminal intimidation stand when the evidence is deemed unreliable? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Tilak Raj vs. State of Himachal Pradesh. This case revolves around allegations of rape, cheating, and criminal intimidation. The Supreme Court overturned the High Court’s decision, acquitting the

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction for cheating and criminal intimidation in Tilak Raj vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top