Indian Penal Code, 1860

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order for violating natural justice in a property dispute case: Prabha Mathur & Anr. vs. Pramod Aggarwal & Ors. (26 September 2008)

/ Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, C.K. Thakker, Civil Procedure, D.K. Jain, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 467, Judges, Natural Justice

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed whether a High Court can set aside orders of lower courts without providing an opportunity for all parties to be heard. This issue arose from a property dispute where the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad reversed decisions made by lower […]

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order for violating natural justice in a property dispute case: Prabha Mathur & Anr. vs. Pramod Aggarwal & Ors. (26 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Robbery Case: Aslam @ Deewan vs. State of Rajasthan (2008)

/ Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 392, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 394, Judges

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 25, 2008 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1531 of 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.3925 of 2007) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Can a person be convicted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) based on the evidence presented? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Robbery Case: Aslam @ Deewan vs. State of Rajasthan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC in hurt case: Manoj & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 September 2008)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 320, Compounding of Offences, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Offences Affecting the Human Body, R. V. Raveendran

Date of the Judgment: 25 September 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source Text] Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran, Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can villagers resolve disputes, even those involving physical harm, through mutual agreement? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where two brothers were convicted of causing hurt with dangerous weapons. The

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC in hurt case: Manoj & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of A.P. vs. Guvva Satyanarayana (24 September 2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 24 September 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Did the Andhra Pradesh High Court err in acquitting the accused in a dowry death case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in State of A.P. v. Guvva Satyanarayana. This case revolves around the death of a wife

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of A.P. vs. Guvva Satyanarayana (24 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles procedure for complaints alleging fraud: Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji (23 September 2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 202, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When a complaint alleging fraud and other related offences is filed, what procedure should a Magistrate follow? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji. The core issue

Supreme Court settles procedure for complaints alleging fraud: Ketankumar Babulal Patel vs. Kesarben Jesangji (23 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Involving Unlawful Assembly: Shankaraya Naik vs. State of Karnataka (2008)

/ Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, S.B. Sinha

Date of the Judgment: September 22, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi Can a conviction for murder be upheld when the accused acted as part of an unlawful assembly, even if the common intention to commit murder wasn’t explicitly proven? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Shankaraya Naik

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Involving Unlawful Assembly: Shankaraya Naik vs. State of Karnataka (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in dowry death case due to flawed charges: Basavaraja & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka (22 September 2008)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, G.S. Singhvi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, V.S. Sirpurkar

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., V.S. Sirpurkar, J., G.S. Singhvi, J. Can a conviction be upheld if the charges framed are inconsistent with the medical evidence presented? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Basavaraja & Ors. v. State of Karnataka.

Supreme Court overturns conviction in dowry death case due to flawed charges: Basavaraja & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka (22 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces rape conviction to outraging modesty due to lack of specific evidence: Premiya @ Prem Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan (22 September 2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 354, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Mukundakam Sharma Can a conviction for rape be altered if the evidence suggests a different, less severe offense? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in

Supreme Court reduces rape conviction to outraging modesty due to lack of specific evidence: Premiya @ Prem Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan (22 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Offences Relating to Marriage

Okay, I’m ready to continue generating the WordPress blog post based on the provided Supreme Court Judgment. ## Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008) “`html Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2008 Case: Doi Wala

Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants limited relief to under-trial prisoner in Pramod Kumar Saxena vs. Union of India (2008)

/ C.K. Thakker, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Criminal Breach of Trust, D.K. Jain, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges

Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Citation: Pramod Kumar Saxena v. Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 58 of 2007 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., D.K. Jain, J. What happens when an individual is stuck in jail for over a decade while awaiting trial? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical

Supreme Court grants limited relief to under-trial prisoner in Pramod Kumar Saxena vs. Union of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside Bombay HC order in assault case: State of Maharashtra vs. Sujay Mangesh Poyarekar (2008)

/ C.K. Thakker, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 378, D.K. Jain, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 504, Judges

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J. and D.K. Jain, J. When can an appellate court overturn an acquittal? The Supreme Court of India deliberated on this crucial question in an appeal against an order by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The case arose from an incident involving

Supreme Court sets aside Bombay HC order in assault case: State of Maharashtra vs. Sujay Mangesh Poyarekar (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Atrocity Case: Daulatram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 313, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307/34, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma, Offences Against Human Body, Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(2)(v)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Does familial relation to a victim automatically discredit a witness’s testimony? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Daulatram S/o Sadram Teli v. State of Chhattisgarh, concerning a conviction under Section 302

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Atrocity Case: Daulatram vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top