Indian Penal Code with Section 323

Supreme Court reduces sentence in Atrocities case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 323, Judges, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(r), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(s)

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Reduction of sentence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Vetrivel vs. State Represented by its Deputy Superintendent of Police & Anr. Judgment Date: 19 January 2022 Introduction Date of the […]

Supreme Court reduces sentence in Atrocities case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Criminal Appeal for Re-evaluation: Geeta Devi vs. State of U.P. (2022)

/ Appeals, B. V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 378, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 323, Indian Penal Code with Section 325, Indian Penal Code with Section 452, Judges, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Remands Criminal Appeal for Re-evaluation: Geeta Devi vs. State of U.P. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Proper procedure for High Courts when dealing with appeals against acquittals. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Geeta Devi vs. State of U.P. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 18 January 2022 Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: Criminal

Supreme Court Remands Criminal Appeal for Re-evaluation: Geeta Devi vs. State of U.P. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds FIR under Gangsters Act: Padma Mishra vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 323, Indian Penal Code with Section 506, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Offences against Public Tranquility, Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 with Section 2(b), Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 with Section 2(c), Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 with Section 3

Supreme Court Upholds FIR under Gangsters Act: Padma Mishra vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an FIR under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 can be quashed if it discloses offences under the Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Padma Mishra vs. State of Uttarakhand & Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds FIR under Gangsters Act: Padma Mishra vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top