Indian Registration Act, 1908

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Possessory Rights from Agreement to Sell: Ghanshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi (2 June 2023)

/ Dipankar Datta, Indian Registration Act, 1908, Indian Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Possessory Rights, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 53A, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Possessory Rights from Agreement to Sell: Ghanshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an agreement to sell, along with a possession memo and receipt of full payment, confers possessory rights sufficient for eviction of the transferor acting as a licensee. CASE TYPE: Civil (Eviction and Mesne Profits) Case […]

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Possessory Rights from Agreement to Sell: Ghanshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi (2 June 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights: Ghanshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi (2023)

/ Dipankar Datta, Indian Registration Act, 1908, Indian Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Possessory Rights, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 53A, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an agreement to sell, along with a memo of possession and receipt of full payment, grants sufficient possessory rights to evict a transferor acting as a licensee. CASE TYPE: Civil (Eviction and Property Law) Case Name: Ghanshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights: Ghanshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects ‘Sham Transaction’ Claim: Damodhar Narayan Sawale vs. Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 9, Indian Registration Act, 1908, Indian Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 with Section 36A, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 with Section 36B, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 5, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects ‘Sham Transaction’ Claim: Damodhar Narayan Sawale vs. Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered sale deed can be deemed a sham transaction and void based on claims of it being a collateral security for a loan, and the applicability of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed, Rejects ‘Sham Transaction’ Claim: Damodhar Narayan Sawale vs. Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Rights in Property Dispute: Gopi @ Goverdhannath vs. Sri Ballabh Vyas (2022)

/ Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 with Section 10(2)(i), Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 with Section 10(2)(vi), Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 with Section 10(3)(a), C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Registration Act, 1908, Indian Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 109, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 54, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 9

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Rights in Property Dispute: Gopi @ Goverdhannath vs. Sri Ballabh Vyas (2022) Date of the Judgment: September 22, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 446 Judges: Indira Banerjee, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. (Majority Opinion by C.T. Ravikumar, J.) Can a tenant’s claim of ownership, without any supporting evidence, override a landlord’s registered

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Rights in Property Dispute: Gopi @ Goverdhannath vs. Sri Ballabh Vyas (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of Petrol Pump Applicant Due to Lease Commencement Clause: Anapurna Jaiswal vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (30 September 2021)

/ Contract Law, Indian Registration Act, 1908, Indian Registration Act, 1908 with Section 47, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Lease Agreements, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Public Procurement, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 105, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 5

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of Petrol Pump Applicant Due to Lease Commencement Clause LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a lease agreement, which stipulates that its term commences from the date of approval of a petrol pump, qualifies as a valid lease for the purpose of awarding marks in a petrol pump dealership application process. CASE TYPE: Civil

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of Petrol Pump Applicant Due to Lease Commencement Clause: Anapurna Jaiswal vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (30 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement: Khushi Ram vs. Nawal Singh (22 February 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 15, Indian Registration Act, 1908, Indian Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Registration of Documents, Succession of Property

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement: Khushi Ram vs. Nawal Singh (2021) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 87 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a family settlement be valid if it involves relatives from the maternal side? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent

Supreme Court Upholds Family Settlement: Khushi Ram vs. Nawal Singh (22 February 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top