Indian Succession Act, 1956

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2025)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 68, Indian Succession Act, 1956, Indian Succession Act, 1956 with Section 63, Judges, Sandeep Mehta, Vikram Nath

Date of the Judgment: April 15, 2025 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a High Court decision be overturned if it misinterprets evidence and disregards findings of lower courts? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving a property dispute. The court found that the High Court had […]

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on oral partition in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2024)

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 68, Indian Succession Act, 1956, Indian Succession Act, 1956 with Section 63

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on oral partition in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an oral partition of property was sufficiently proven. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors. [Judgment Date]: January 03, 2024 Date of the Judgment: January 03, 2024 Citation: 2024

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on oral partition in property dispute: Rajendhiran vs. Muthaiammal (2024) Read Post »

Scroll to Top