Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10

Supreme Court Clarifies Labour Court’s Jurisdiction Under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act in Wage Dispute: M/s Bombay Chemical Industries vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr. (04 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 33(C)(2), Judges, Labour Court Jurisdiction, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Labour Court’s Jurisdiction Under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act Date of the Judgment: 04 February 2022 Citation: M/s Bombay Chemical Industries vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr. (2022) INSC 117 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a Labour Court decide on a wage dispute under Section 33(C)(2) […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Labour Court’s Jurisdiction Under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act in Wage Dispute: M/s Bombay Chemical Industries vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr. (04 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act in Dismissal Cases: John D’Souza vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (2019) INSC 980 (16 October 2019)

/ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 11A, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 33(2)(b), Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act in Dismissal Cases Date of the Judgment: 16 October 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 980 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Surya Kant, J. Can a Labour Court, while considering an application for approval of dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act in Dismissal Cases: John D’Souza vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (2019) INSC 980 (16 October 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Impleadment of Parent Company in Industrial Dispute: Globe Ground India Employees Union vs. Lufthansa German Airlines (2019)

/ Corporate Veil, Impleadment of Parties, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Judges, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Impleadment of Parent Company in Industrial Dispute: Globe Ground India Employees Union vs. Lufthansa German Airlines (2019) Date of the Judgment: April 23, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 414 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a parent company be impleaded in an industrial dispute involving its subsidiary? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Impleadment of Parent Company in Industrial Dispute: Globe Ground India Employees Union vs. Lufthansa German Airlines (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in Industrial Disputes: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (11 April 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Indu Malhotra, Industrial Adjudication, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Judges, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Industrial Dispute: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of res judicata applies to industrial disputes, preventing re-litigation of previously decided issues. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: Chairman and Managing Director, The Fertilizers And Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd. & Anr. vs. General Secretary FACT

Supreme Court settles the application of Res Judicata in Industrial Disputes: FACT Employees Association vs. FACT Ltd (11 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs contract workers to approach Industrial Tribunal for regularization: Sunil Kumar Biswas vs. Ordinance Factory Board (29 March 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Contract Workers, Dinesh Maheshwari, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Judges, Labour Law

Supreme Court directs contract workers to approach Industrial Tribunal for regularization: Sunil Kumar Biswas vs. Ordinance Factory Board (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contract workers can seek regularization of their services through the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) or if they must approach the Industrial Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case

Supreme Court directs contract workers to approach Industrial Tribunal for regularization: Sunil Kumar Biswas vs. Ordinance Factory Board (29 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25(F), Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Right to be Heard, Service Law

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can pass an order against a party without providing them an opportunity to be heard. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Limited vs. Bhagirath Singh (Dead) Through L. Rs. [Judgment

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Employee Misconduct Case: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank (20 September 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dismissal, Employee Misconduct, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 11A, Judges, Labour Court, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Employee Misconduct Case: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank (2018) Date of the Judgment: 20 September 2018 Citation: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr., Civil Appeal No.1841 of 2010 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a bank employee be dismissed for consuming alcohol

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Employee Misconduct Case: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for Labour Court in termination cases: Kurukshetra University vs. Prithvi Singh (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Domestic Inquiry, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo), Judges, Labour Law, R.K. Agrawal, Retrenchment, Termination of Employment, Workman

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for Labour Court in termination cases: Kurukshetra University vs. Prithvi Singh (2018) Date of the Judgment: February 15, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 128 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. The Supreme Court addressed the crucial question of how Labour Courts should handle cases of employee termination, especially when

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for Labour Court in termination cases: Kurukshetra University vs. Prithvi Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in Co-operative Society Employee Disputes: Annamma vs. Cochin Co-operative Hospital Society (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Judges, Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 with Section 100, Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 with Section 69, Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 with Section 70, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Co-operative Society Employee Disputes: Annamma vs. Cochin Co-operative Hospital Society (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether service disputes between a Co-operative Society and its employees are triable under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. CASE TYPE: Labour Law, Co-operative Law Case Name: Smt. K.A. Annamma vs.

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in Co-operative Society Employee Disputes: Annamma vs. Cochin Co-operative Hospital Society (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of LIC Employee in Fraud Case: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Disciplinary Proceedings, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Judges, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960, Misconduct, R.K. Agrawal, Service Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the dismissal of an employee for issuing receipts without receiving payment is justified. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. Judgment Date: 11 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 11 September 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 788 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of LIC Employee in Fraud Case: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the validity of Industrial Dispute reference after workers’ admission as contract labourers: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal (2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Contract Labor, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 7-A, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma, Regularization of Contract Labor, Sham Agreements

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 25, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether an industrial dispute referred by the Government of West Bengal under Section 7-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was valid, especially when the workers had previously acknowledged their status as contract laborers. The core issue revolves

Supreme Court settles the validity of Industrial Dispute reference after workers’ admission as contract labourers: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top