Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25B

Supreme Court Upholds Retrenchment Rules: Mohd. Ali vs. State of H.P. (2018)

/ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Retrenchment Rules: Mohd. Ali vs. State of H.P. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a casual laborer is entitled to retrenchment benefits under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 if they have not worked for 240 days in the 12 calendar months preceding their termination. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Mohd. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Retrenchment Rules: Mohd. Ali vs. State of H.P. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008)

/ Harjit Singh Bedi, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 03, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4445 of 2006 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Does a part-time employee qualify as a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling them to protection against unlawful retrenchment? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Div.

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top