Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Casual Workers: Food Corporation of India vs. Their Workmen (2023)

/ Estoppel, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10(1)(d), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 17B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Principle of Approbate and Reprobate

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Casual Workers: Food Corporation of India vs. Their Workmen (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether casual workers are entitled to regularization after prolonged service, despite initial procedural flaws in their retrenchment. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: Their Workmen through the Joint Secretary (Welfare), Food Corporation of India Executive Staff Union vs. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Casual Workers: Food Corporation of India vs. Their Workmen (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of FCI Workers after 18 Years: Food Corporation of India vs. Their Workmen (2023)

/ Approbate and Reprobate, Estoppel, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10(1)(d), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 17B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Labour Law, Regularization of Employees, Retrenchment

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of FCI Workers after 18 Years: Food Corporation of India vs. Their Workmen (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Food Corporation of India (FCI) could deny regularization to its workmen after having implemented an award directing the same for over 18 years. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: Their Workmen through the

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of FCI Workers after 18 Years: Food Corporation of India vs. Their Workmen (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Retrenchment Under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act for Daily Wage Workers: K.V. Anil Mithra & Anr. vs. Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit & Anr. (27 October 2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, Retrenchment

Supreme Court Clarifies Retrenchment Under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act for Daily Wage Workers LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the termination of daily wage workers without complying with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is valid, irrespective of the legality of their initial appointments. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute/Labour Law Case Name: K.V. Anil

Supreme Court Clarifies Retrenchment Under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act for Daily Wage Workers: K.V. Anil Mithra & Anr. vs. Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit & Anr. (27 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Industrial Disputes Act to Irrigation Department Employees: State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. vs. Somdutt Sharma (29 September 2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Factories Act, 1948, Factories Act, 1948 with Section 2(k), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 2(m), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25L, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25N, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Industrial Disputes Act to Irrigation Department Employees LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Irrigation Department is an “Industrial Establishment” under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Labour Law. Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. vs. Somdutt Sharma. Judgment Date: 29 September 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29 September

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Industrial Disputes Act to Irrigation Department Employees: State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. vs. Somdutt Sharma (29 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Termination: Ranbir Singh vs. Executive Engineer PWD (2021)

/ Daily Wage Workers, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Labour Law, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Reinstatement, Retrenchment

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Termination: Ranbir Singh vs. Executive Engineer PWD (2021) Date of the Judgment: September 2, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 580 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J. and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a daily wage worker, whose services were terminated in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act,

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Termination: Ranbir Singh vs. Executive Engineer PWD (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles back wages for temporary workers in Superintending Engineer vs. M. Natesan (2019)

/ Back Wages, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 17B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, Labour Law, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy, Reinstatement, Temporary Workers

Supreme Court Settles Back Wages for Temporary Workers: Superintending Engineer vs. M. Natesan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether temporary workers are entitled to back wages upon reinstatement. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: The Superintending Engineer, TWAD Board & Another vs. M. Natesan ETC. Judgment Date: 10 May 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10 May

Supreme Court settles back wages for temporary workers in Superintending Engineer vs. M. Natesan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Employee Refusing Alternate Job: Manju Saxena vs. Union of India (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, Retrenchment

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Employee Refusing Alternate Job: Manju Saxena vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s refusal to accept alternate job offers from the employer constitutes abandonment of service, thereby justifying termination. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: Manju Saxena vs. Union of India & Anr. Judgment Date: 3rd December

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Employee Refusing Alternate Job: Manju Saxena vs. Union of India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Retrenchment Rules: Mohd. Ali vs. State of H.P. (2018)

/ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Retrenchment Rules: Mohd. Ali vs. State of H.P. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a casual laborer is entitled to retrenchment benefits under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 if they have not worked for 240 days in the 12 calendar months preceding their termination. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Mohd.

Supreme Court Upholds Retrenchment Rules: Mohd. Ali vs. State of H.P. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008)

/ Harjit Singh Bedi, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 03, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4445 of 2006 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Does a part-time employee qualify as a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling them to protection against unlawful retrenchment? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Div.

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the criteria for reinstatement and back wages in cases of termination of service: Talwara Coop. Credit vs. Sushil Kumar (2008)

/ Cyriac Joseph, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 11A, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 17-B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25F, Judges, S.B. Sinha

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5951 of 2008 [Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 336 of 2005] Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Cyriac Joseph, J. When an employee’s services are terminated, what factors should an Industrial Court consider when deciding whether to reinstate the employee with back wages? The

Supreme Court clarifies the criteria for reinstatement and back wages in cases of termination of service: Talwara Coop. Credit vs. Sushil Kumar (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top