Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Supreme Court settles maintainability of civil suits in labour disputes: B.S. Bharti vs. I.B.P. Company Limited (25 August 2004)

/ A.K. Mathur, Civil Suits, Industrial Disputes, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2-A, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(k), Judges, Labour Law, N. Santosh Hegde, S.B. Sinha, Termination of Employment

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 25 August 2004 Judges: N. Santosh Hegde, S.B. Sinha, A.K. Mathur When can an employee bypass industrial dispute mechanisms and directly file a civil suit against their employer? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in B.S. Bharti vs. I.B.P. Company Limited, a case concerning the termination of […]

Supreme Court settles maintainability of civil suits in labour disputes: B.S. Bharti vs. I.B.P. Company Limited (25 August 2004) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘industry’ under Industrial Disputes Act: Bangalore Water Supply vs. A. Rajappa (1978) INSC 298 (21 February 1978)

/ A.D. Koshal, D.A. Desai, Definition of Industry, Employee Rights, Industrial Disputes, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(j), Jaswant Singh, Judges, Labor Law, O. Chinnappa Reddy, P.N. Shinghal, R.S. Pathak, V.R. Krishna Iyer

Date of the Judgment: 21 February 1978 Citation: 1978 INSC 298 Judges: Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, Justice D.A. Desai, Justice R.S. Pathak, Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy, Justice A.D. Koshal, Justice P.N. Shinghal, Justice Jaswant Singh What constitutes an ‘industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? This question has been a subject of extensive legal debate.

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘industry’ under Industrial Disputes Act: Bangalore Water Supply vs. A. Rajappa (1978) INSC 298 (21 February 1978) Read Post »

Scroll to Top