Industrial Law

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Corporation Employees: Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited vs. Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Employees Welfare Union & Anr. (2024) INSC 446 (17 May 2024)

/ Industrial Dispute, Industrial Law, Permanent Status, Regularization of Employees, Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 with Section 2(3), Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 with Section 3, Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 with Section 7, Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 with Section 2(3), Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 with Section 2(6)

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Corporation Employees Date of the Judgment: 17 May 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 446 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J. and Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale, J. Can a government corporation deny permanent status to employees who have worked for an extended period? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Corporation Employees: Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited vs. Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Employees Welfare Union & Anr. (2024) INSC 446 (17 May 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Standing Orders vs. CCA Rules in Disciplinary Proceedings for Workmen (29 November 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, Industrial Law, Industrial Law with Section 13B, Standing Orders

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Standing Orders vs. CCA Rules in Disciplinary Proceedings for Workmen LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (CCA Rules) versus Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 in disciplinary proceedings against workmen. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Industrial Law Case Name: Union of

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Standing Orders vs. CCA Rules in Disciplinary Proceedings for Workmen (29 November 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Extension for Sugar Factory, Prioritizing Economic Factors and Farmer Welfare: Swami Samarth Sugars vs. Loknete Marutrao Ghule Patil (2022) INSC 604 (13 July 2022)

/ Delays in litigation, Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Essential Commodities Act, 1955 with Section 3, Hemant Gupta, Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum, Industrial Law, Judges, Litigation, Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 with Clause 6A, Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 with Clause 6C, Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 with Clause 6D, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Allows Sugar Factory Extension, Prioritizes Farmer Benefits Date of the Judgment: 13 July 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 604 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a sugar factory’s operational timeline be extended despite delays caused by litigation? This was the core question before the Supreme Court, which recently ruled in favor of

Supreme Court Upholds Extension for Sugar Factory, Prioritizing Economic Factors and Farmer Welfare: Swami Samarth Sugars vs. Loknete Marutrao Ghule Patil (2022) INSC 604 (13 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Employer’s Power to Add “Break in Service” as Punishment: Sri Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. vs. Coimbatore District Textile Workers Union (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra, Industrial Disputes, Industrial Law, Judges, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(c), Standing Orders

Supreme Court Restricts Employer’s Power to Add “Break in Service” as Punishment: Sri Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. vs. Coimbatore District Textile Workers Union (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer can add “break in service” as a form of punishment in the certified standing orders. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: The Management of Sri Ramnarayan Mills

Supreme Court Restricts Employer’s Power to Add “Break in Service” as Punishment: Sri Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. vs. Coimbatore District Textile Workers Union (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top