Standing Orders Archives

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Standing Orders vs. CCA Rules in Disciplinary Proceedings for Workmen (29 November 2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Standing Orders vs. CCA Rules in Disciplinary Proceedings for Workmen LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (CCA Rules) versus Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 in disciplinary proceedings against workmen. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Industrial Law Case Name: Union of […]

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Standing Orders vs. CCA Rules in Disciplinary Proceedings for Workmen (29 November 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Fine Recovery Case: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. vs. Ramesh Kumar Sharma (2020)

January 16, 2020 / Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(k), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2A, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Standing Orders

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Fine Recovery Case: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. vs. Ramesh Kumar Sharma (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court can adjudicate a dispute regarding the recovery of a fine imposed on workmen, or if such a matter falls exclusively under the jurisdiction of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Fine Recovery Case: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. vs. Ramesh Kumar Sharma (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Employer’s Power to Add “Break in Service” as Punishment: Sri Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. vs. Coimbatore District Textile Workers Union (2018)

November 2, 2018 / Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra, Industrial Disputes, Industrial Law, Judges, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(c), Standing Orders

Supreme Court Restricts Employer’s Power to Add “Break in Service” as Punishment: Sri Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. vs. Coimbatore District Textile Workers Union (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer can add “break in service” as a form of punishment in the certified standing orders. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: The Management of Sri Ramnarayan Mills

Supreme Court Restricts Employer’s Power to Add “Break in Service” as Punishment: Sri Ramnarayan Mills Ltd. vs. Coimbatore District Textile Workers Union (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies resignation rules for employees under the Industrial Employment Act: Sanjay Jain vs. National Aviation Co. (2018)

November 1, 2018 / Arun Mishra, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 with Standing Order 18, Judges, Labour Law, Resignation, Standing Orders, Termination of Service, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Resignation Rules Under Industrial Employment Act: Sanjay Jain vs. National Aviation Co. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s resignation is effective immediately upon serving the required notice period, or if it requires acceptance by the employer under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Sanjay Jain

Supreme Court clarifies resignation rules for employees under the Industrial Employment Act: Sanjay Jain vs. National Aviation Co. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Labour Court’s Power in Declaring Workmen Permanent: U.P. State Sugar & Cane Development Corporation Ltd. vs. Chini Mill Mazdoor Sangh & Ors. (26 September 2008)

September 26, 2008 / Altamas Kabir, Industrial Disputes Act, Judges, Labour Law, Markandey Katju, Standing Orders, Workmen

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2008 Judges: Altamas Kabir, J., Markandey Katju, J. The central question in this case revolves around whether a Labour Court can declare seasonal workers as permanent employees, especially when their work’s nature appears continuous. The Supreme Court addressed this issue in an appeal concerning the U.P. State Sugar

Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Labour Court’s Power in Declaring Workmen Permanent: U.P. State Sugar & Cane Development Corporation Ltd. vs. Chini Mill Mazdoor Sangh & Ors. (26 September 2008) Read Post »