Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 18 Archives

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Assets in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether development rights of a corporate debtor over a property can be considered as an asset during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Victory Iron Works Ltd. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Debtor’s Asset in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023)

March 14, 2023 / Contract Law, Development Agreement, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 18, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 25, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 3(27), Judges, Leave and License Agreement, Pankaj Mithal, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Debtor’s Asset in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether development rights of a Corporate Debtor over a property can be considered as its asset for the purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Development Rights as Corporate Debtor’s Asset in Insolvency: Victory Iron Works Ltd. vs. Jitendra Lohia (2023) Read Post »